disrespectful libertarians hijack CPAC?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • nawainwright

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 23, 2009
    1,096
    38
    New Hampshire
    ROTFL!!!! Those mean nasty dirty libertarians, why are they always picking on us? Swinging their MASSIVE voter power back and forth like they are the big #($% around here. They slander the tender and fragile republican base....

    Say what you want about the Libertarians, but this is beyond "hyped"
     
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 7, 2011
    2,380
    38
    Jeffersonville
    Humorous is one way to put it - "uber-disrespectful" being part of the vocabulary definitely backs up the humorous notion...

    Fox news not backing Ron Paul, and backing one of their own commentators for the presidency, also, is "uber-disrespectful" and humorous.
     
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 17, 2009
    2,489
    38
    Tampa, FL
    I have a friend on the ground at CPAC. Ron Paul bussed in college students for the sole purpose of voting for him in the straw pole. That's a liberal trick :rolleyes:
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,044
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    129183860124678555.jpg
     

    Duncan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 27, 2010
    763
    16
    South of Indy
    I have a friend on the ground at CPAC. Ron Paul bussed in college students for the sole purpose of voting for him in the straw pole. That's a liberal trick :rolleyes:

    If that info is accurate and correct ... I am sorry to hear that .
    It upsets me if Libertarians did this .. of course RP is a Republican .
    In any event I disrespect this type of ballot stuffing .

    Thanks

    Duncan
     

    Duncan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 27, 2010
    763
    16
    South of Indy
    Just did some spot check reading of this article .
    This guy has no clue what the basis of the Libertarian philosophy is .
    Yes there are some people in the party that meet the extreme ideals that he has labeled the party with .
    But his analysis is wrong .

    Thanks
    Duncan
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    If that info is accurate and correct ... I am sorry to hear that .
    It upsets me if Libertarians did this .. of course RP is a Republican .
    In any event I disrespect this type of ballot stuffing .

    Thanks

    Duncan
    I seriously doubt Paul "bussed in" anyone. Did groups of his college supporters show up on buses as groups? Quite likely. It's an economical way to travel, especially after having to pay the CPAC entry fees. ($35 students/$75 general and even more for special packages). I doubt Ron Paul had to do anything other than show up, to draw a crowd of interested students. Of course, these people are just doing what they've wanted libertarians to do for years. Work from within the movement to make a change. Unfortunately, when you do exactly what they've been saying you should do, they get all butthurt and start accusing people of all sorts of things. There was an interesting tweet on CPAC and the Paulites.

    "I witnessed someone calling Ron Paul people a “cult” while eating a cake shaped like Reagan’s face."

    Guess it only matters if you're worshiping a dead guy, rather than supporting a live one. CPAC, and the right are changing as their base ages and finds a taste for handouts. The young are going to take it over and the geezer neo-cons had better learn to live with that. Their days are numbered.
     
    Last edited:

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    What an utterly asinine article.

    Libertarians and Conservatives are as different as Libertarians and Liberals. The truth is libertarians are the worst form of political affiliation in the nation. Combining the desire of economic greed, with the amoral desire to promote any behavior regardless of its cost to our culture is a stark departure from the intent of the Founding Fathers.
     

    level.eleven

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 12, 2009
    4,673
    48
    My favorite CPAC moments, in no particular order.

    Dick Cheney presenting the "Defender of the Constitution Award" to Don Rumsfeld.

    As mentioned, the cake tweet.

    Trump calling for a 25% tax on all Chinese goods.

    The funniest, has to be the warning issued via a fundraiser email from one of the groups in attendance. Don't go out drinking with teh geys, they will try and getcha!

    Malkin Award Nominee - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    I have a friend on the ground at CPAC. Ron Paul bussed in college students for the sole purpose of voting for him in the straw pole. That's a liberal trick :rolleyes:

    Just found another source (not my friend who was there) of someone else who saw the kids bussed in by Ron Paul to vote for him in the straw poll.

    YID With LID: Why Ron Paul's Victory in the CPAC Straw Poll is Meaningless

    Are you saying that CPAC is only for people in the Washington D.C. area? Because I thought it was a national event that people from all over the country came to. The fact that Ron Paul supporters are motivated and organized enough to arrange for group transportation says a lot about their willingness to engage these Neocons and beat them at their own game, and support their candidate of choice.

    As for the baseless rumor about CPAC attendees being paid, what a laugh. And the progressive blogger that is spreading that rumor... wow. He must not have ever met at Ron Paul supporter before. They are among the most active and dedicated group out there. The ones I know don't need to be paid to support Ron Paul -- in fact, they contribute their own money to his election campaigns.


    Who in their right mind supports Mitt Romney anyways? Maybe we should all be wondering if the Democrats are paying to send people to CPAC, or if the GOP really is that packed filled with socialists.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Lmao.

    Mitt Romney: supporter of socialized medicine and gun control. A Big Government socialist loser like Romney regularly shows popularity at CPAC -- and nobody bats an eye.

    But a guy like Ron Paul, who won't put his name on anything unless it is overwhelmingly constitutional, shows popularity at CPAC -- and it must be election fraud! Real Republicans wouldn't dare support a constitutionalist!

    Bwahahaha. Brilliant, Tim! Mitt Romney is the REAL conservative favorite. Keep reminding people that the GOP is joke and would never support liberty on its own. If that isn't your point then you sure did a good job of driving it home. LOL
     

    hoosier_gooner

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 13, 2011
    10
    1
    Indianapolis
    I have a friend on the ground at CPAC. Ron Paul bussed in college students for the sole purpose of voting for him in the straw pole. That's a liberal trick :rolleyes:

    Every single speaker at CPAC does the same thing. Romney paid all travel and room expenses for his crowd. So your argument doesn't hold water.

    Anyway, since this is becoming a liberty bashing thread let me chime in with my 2 cents.

    'If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.' You know who said that? The champion of a large sector of the greater conservative movement did--none other than Ronald flippin' Reagan. And he was absolutely correct about that statement. The real basis of modern conservatism is that of classical liberalism or libertarianism, however in recent generations conservatism has been co-opted by disenfranchised progressive socialists. That's right, what makes up the neo-conservitism movement championed by Republicans like George W. Bush, his father alike, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and most of the Republican leaders who have steered the Conservative debate for generations have all been adherents to neoconservative doctrine.

    You want to know the problem with neoconservatism? Well, for starters its basic philosophical roots are that of socialism. Yes, neoconservatism is a socialist doctrine. Two of the most influential people in its philosophy were Leo Strauss and Leon Trotsky and yet neoconservatives despise communism without ever knowing their own movement was influenced by the writings of V.I. Lenin's closest comrade turned rival. What's even worse is that neoconservatism preaches an ideology of blind nationalism, confuses the population to the difference between defensive military spending and aggressive military conquest, adopts forms of corporatism (a fascist trait of the merging of state and corporation), and just like its communism brother--will lead to the economic destruction of any society that adopts its tenets.

    What the libertarians, Constitutionalists, Classical Liberals or whatever variation of ethos preach are limited government, non-intervention, fiscal responsibility, business partnerships with foreign nations but warn against the consequences of permanent alliances. Basically they want a small government that keeps a military able to protect its sovereignty and legal structure to protect the individual rights granted to us by our creator so that each individual may seek out and create their own destinies so much as their ability and drive may allow.

    I for one do not adhere to socialism in any of its forms whether it be communism, fascism, or the self denial closet socialism of the neoconservative movement. I think classical liberalism gave us a good basis of how to govern ourselves; it allows each individual the right to pursue the highest levels of freedom, peace, and prosperity.
     

    SirRealism

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    1,779
    38
    'If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.' You know who said that? The champion of a large sector of the greater conservative movement did--none other than Ronald flippin' Reagan. And he was absolutely correct about that statement. The real basis of modern conservatism is that of classical liberalism or libertarianism, however in recent generations conservatism has been co-opted by disenfranchised progressive socialists. That's right, what makes up the neo-conservitism movement championed by Republicans like George W. Bush, his father alike, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and most of the Republican leaders who have steered the Conservative debate for generations have all been adherents to neoconservative doctrine.

    Cool Reagan quote. Thanks, I hadn't heard that.

    As to the article in the OP: nothing but envious tripe. That pathetic wing of the "conservatives" just can't see fit to recognize that Ron Paul hasn't "given up identity..." he has retained it through consistent adherence to his principles and the Constitution.
     
    Top Bottom