Do laws deter?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • abnk

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 25, 2008
    1,680
    38
    There is a military leadership axiom that says: "Never give an order you know won't be obeyed". The more laws enacted because someone cries "DO SOMETHING" about a particular pet peeve, the less respect people have for the law. Speed limits are one good example; income tax law is another. When the law is so complex and voluminous that only lawyers understand it (and that only the parts they study as a specialty) and everyone becomes a criminal in one way or another, people find it easier to disregard the laws they disagree with. It's a slippery slope that's brought us to the brink of governmental tyranny at all levels and it will be hard to turn the tyranny back. I can't think of a single new law (as opposed to a law repealing another law) that we need in this country or that would be good for us.

    I don't know about that. The regulation about not being on the phone while driving on post is a stupid one, but many people follow it because it's not worth an Article 15.
     

    abnk

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 25, 2008
    1,680
    38
    We have a couple of ideas here that are separate.

    1. Do laws deter crime?


    Well, no. The probability of being caught and severity of punishment deters crime.

    You're arguing semantics. The severity of punishment is established by laws, so if the severity of punishment deters, laws do automagically.
     

    littletommy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 29, 2009
    13,147
    113
    A holler in Kentucky
    The answer to the OP is a simple NO. We have laws, right? Practically everything is against some sort of law, right? We have millions upon millions of violations of just about every law there is, on any given day, right? NO, laws do not deter crime. Period.
     

    Lex Concord

    Not so well-known member
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Dec 4, 2008
    4,490
    83
    Morgan County
    Oh no you didn't approximate the acceleration due to gravity at 9 m/s^2. All engineers everywhere have just had a simultaneous stroke and must now take a moment of silence to repair the space-time continuum.

    Next time, please use at least 9.8 m/s*s. This will sufficiently reduce the harm suffered to mechanical engineers everywhere. Thanks,

    I'd like to say I did it on purpose for just that effect...I was tired....and my last physics class was a loooooong time ago. Probably a good thing I opted not to continue on with the engineering major ;)

    You'd think getting egg on my face like this would deter me from wanting to be a smartass....still waiting for that deterrent effect to kick in :D
     

    E5RANGER375

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Feb 22, 2010
    11,507
    38
    BOATS n' HO's, Indy East
    i think stiff consequences deter.

    If every child molester knew they would end up as hog chow if they touched my daughter then im sure it would help deter them. some, maybe not. but i bet you it would work better than our failed judicial system, plus i would kill them anyways no matter what, so its just a waste of tax money by sending them to court or jail.
     

    Jeremiah

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Aug 26, 2008
    1,772
    36
    Avilla, IN
    Do you speed? are you aware that everyday you probably commit three felonies a day? Sir I think you have some things to sit and consider, First what is right and wrong has little to do with whether or not that act is legal. In new Zealand it is illegal to use a firearm for self defense, so are you wrong for popping a knife wielding intruder with your shotgun?

    i think if the legal risk is all that has kept you from trying things, you must have lived quite the sheltered life. I haven't every smoked pot, (illegal) but because I have no interest to smoke, I also have never smoked cigarettes, they are legal, but I have no interest in smoking.

    and as far as considering "legal" everything hitler did, was strictly speaking not against German law under Nazi rule.
     

    hoosiertriangle

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 17, 2008
    356
    16
    Avon, IN
    Oh you'd wish there was more deterrent effect if all the mechanical engineers in the world fell over dead from stroke or heart attack by underestimating the acceleration due to gravity more than 8.2%.

    But in all seriousness, thanks for owning up to the egregiousness of the estimation. It has soothed my mini-stroke greatly.

    I'd like to say I did it on purpose for just that effect...I was tired....and my last physics class was a loooooong time ago. Probably a good thing I opted not to continue on with the engineering major ;)

    You'd think getting egg on my face like this would deter me from wanting to be a smartass....still waiting for that deterrent effect to kick in :D
     

    308jake

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    78   0   0
    Feb 5, 2010
    2,442
    63
    Brownsburg
    Gun control laws are designed to disarm the law abiding population so that we cannot rise up against the government. The government knows criminals will always have access to firearms the same way they had alcohol during prohibition. Their goal is to disarm their flock.
     

    leftsock

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 16, 2009
    984
    18
    Greenwood
    You're arguing semantics. The severity of punishment is established by laws, so if the severity of punishment deters, laws do automagically.

    Laws only carry weight if they're enforced, and we have many that aren't. There's no magic to it.


    Let's go back to the beginning:
    Do you all honestly believe that tougher gun laws would not decrease deaths caused by guns? Sure, some sociopaths will do what they want to do no matter what, but most sane criminals will be disincentivised if the punishment were hard enough.
    Tougher gun laws like what? Describe a proposed law that would be "tougher" than our current ones and will directly decrease deaths caused by guns. Just claiming that "tougher laws would decrease deaths caused by guns" is a vapid statement.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    3,121
    36
    NE Indiana
    Really? Do you think adultery and promiscuity are as prevalent in Islamic countries as here, in the US? To me that's proof that harsh punishment does deter the behavior it punishes. Of course, it will never deter 100%, but it works. Chicago laws are not harsh enough.
    From my experience in two countries in the Persian Gulf in 1990-1994, adultery, prostitution, promiscuity, homosexuality, child exploitation and child molestation were quite prevalent. Many of the guards (local population) at the base where I was stationed TAD took long weekends (3 day), going to "the market" to drink and do things that were not allowed in their local area. Many quietly spoke to us about what was to be found in the market and what they did there. It was done with a wink and a nudge.
     

    Benny

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 66.7%
    2   1   0
    May 20, 2008
    21,037
    38
    Drinking your milkshake
    Very strict gun laws seem to work great in Japan. Why couldn't we do the same here? Because we are to selfish to give our firearms for the benefit of the greater good.

    You could possibly be posting in the wrong forum...But that's just a guess.

    i think stiff consequences deter.

    If every child molester knew they would end up as LIVE hog chow if they touched my daughter then im sure it would help deter them. some, maybe not. but i bet you it would work better than our failed judicial system, plus i would kill them anyways no matter what, so its just a waste of tax money by sending them to court or jail.

    Fixed.:D

    Do you speed? are you aware that everyday you probably commit three felonies a day?

    Just out of curiosity, what felonies to "law abiding" citizens commit on a daily basis?(This is a genuine question)
     

    Armed Eastsider

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 13, 2010
    747
    16
    Just out of curiosity, what felonies to "law abiding" citizens commit on a daily basis?(This is a genuine question)

    I was wondering this myself. One could argue that pretty much everybody breaks atleast 1 law a day (traffic violations etc), but I dont think the same could be said for felonies, much less 3 a day.
     

    Jeremiah

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Aug 26, 2008
    1,772
    36
    Avilla, IN

    Jeremiah

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Aug 26, 2008
    1,772
    36
    Avilla, IN
    the videos explain why police are really not your friends and you should never resist them, but don't talk, if forced to talk, say very little. the first video is a law professor, and the second is a retired detective. He talks about some dirty tricks he used to close cases, and others he had heard of.
     

    Lex Concord

    Not so well-known member
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Dec 4, 2008
    4,490
    83
    Morgan County
    Very strict gun laws seem to work great in Japan. Why couldn't we do the same here? Because we are to selfish to give our firearms for the benefit of the greater good.

    Japan has a completely different culture with respect to weapons in general which goes back long before Columbus landed in the New World, and possibly before Leif Erickson did.

    It was generally considered unacceptable for the common folk to have weapons (swords). It enforced class separation; much the same as the original intent of gun control. Unfortunately for the Japanese, enforcement was so effective and long standing that it has become part of the national culture.

    Out of curiosity, what do you perceive as the "greater good". Collective benefits usually imply that some number of individuals is getting completely screwed - such is the nature of the collective.
     

    leftsock

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 16, 2009
    984
    18
    Greenwood
    Very strict gun laws seem to work great in Japan. Why couldn't we do the same here? Because we are to selfish to give our firearms for the benefit of the greater good.

    A country could eliminate firearms entirely. That would reduce gun-related deaths. We'd just have to find more interesting ways to kill each other then.

    mljj28.jpg


    You know, for the greater good.
     

    Muzzle Flash

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 31, 2010
    109
    16
    Valpo
    Holy cow!!!!! :)::)::): . You know this has been discussed since roman times and were still discussing . Let me tell you my pet beeve about all of this . I forget the exact congress that said it , but I believe it was the congress during G.W.'s first term . And the quote is (or really close to it) We worked harder than the last congress and it's evident by us passing 326 new laws and the last congress only passed 112 .
     
    Top Bottom