Does 2A not apply in US territories (Virgin Islands)

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • miguel

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Oct 24, 2008
    6,620
    113
    16T
    Legislation or not, he wants your gun...

    mapp-pic-655x340.jpg
     

    JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,176
    113
    Indiana
    I have an idea. Grant full citizenship to all the folks in these places. Declare the Constitution supreme in these areas and let it go at that. It is long overdue.
    It's not that simple. As an example, American Samoa has its own territorial constitution and a complete government with their own elected governor, territorial legislature and court system. Appeals from its highest court go to the SCOTUS. It would be up to them to want to change their status, which includes being their own customs territory and no federal income tax. In spite of how the UN categorizes them they are self-governing much like a US state. Their culture, however is distinctly unique to American Samoa, as is the culture for the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands (CNMI) which has a covenant defining the relation ship of them to the US.

    John
     

    JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,176
    113
    Indiana
    Did anyone hear the USVI .gov on Fox just now? *beep* *beep* *beep*

    USVI is backing way up.:D
    I watched it. He was seriously backpedaling with how it was worded but didn't manage to explain himself very well. One can only take such an order on its face as written. If he ever issues one in the future it needs to be worded much differently. ;)

    He is correct that during declared emergencies, state and territorial governments, and the federal government empowers various responding agencies to "go shopping" wherever they need to in order to quickly get immediately needed materials and supplies as close to the disaster as practicable, but it's not by taking private property from private citizens. It's typically done with credit cards and letter contracts to enable paying for materials and supplies from local businesses. The business doesn't have much option to refuse although I've never seen anyone ever make an issue of it. Also allows quickly getting services, sometimes with specialized equipment such as earth movers. Normal procurement methods in accordance with the FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulations) is not designed for rapid emergency procurement; it moves at a snail pace.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom