Draw but don't fire - a real world example

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Bung

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 11, 2012
    253
    18
    Anderson
    Cops draw and point their guns all the time while making an arrest or confronting a criminal in the act of committing a crime. Luckily they often don't fire. They do this for their safety so why should citizens defending property or life, as permitted by law, be any different?

    Well, they are cops. They can shoot people in the back and get a medal for it. They can carry into GFZ's because the state has deemed them worty. If you want to be able to point guns at people and shoot them once they stop being a threat, become a cop.
     

    jwh20

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Feb 22, 2013
    2,069
    48
    Hamilton County Indi
    Do people usually not get in trouble for pulling a gun and then not firing it? Obviously in this instance that was the case. I was always under the impression that doing something like that could put someone on pretty thin ice. Ideas?

    The rule I use is, only draw if you are justified in firing. You always have the option of not firing but to pull your weapon when you are not justified if using it is anywhere from questionable to unlawful depending on where you are. But if you pull due to a threat that you are justified in meeting with lethal force and the sight of the weapon nullifies the threat, then you should be good. In my view, this is a better outcome anyway, because the gun saved your life without you having to kill anyone.
     

    NyleRN

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Dec 14, 2013
    3,866
    113
    Scottsburg
    The rule I use is, only draw if you are justified in firing. You always have the option of not firing but to pull your weapon when you are not justified if using it is anywhere from questionable to unlawful depending on where you are. But if you pull due to a threat that you are justified in meeting with lethal force and the sight of the weapon nullifies the threat, then you should be good. In my view, this is a better outcome anyway, because the gun saved your life without you having to kill anyone.
    THIS
     

    TheSpark

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 26, 2013
    785
    18
    Well, they are cops. They can shoot people in the back and get a medal for it. They can carry into GFZ's because the state has deemed them worty. If you want to be able to point guns at people and shoot them once they stop being a threat, become a cop.

    That was not my point. My point was I don't see a problem with drawing/pointing your gun, if the need absolutely arises, even if you choose not to shoot. I'm not saying anyone, even a cop, should shoot someone who is no longer a threat.
     

    Paul30

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2012
    976
    43
    Some claim he should lock his doors and are right. Many cars these days automatically unlock all doors when you move the transmission from drive to park. I would like to get this changed in the programming and probably can at the dealer. The door physically unlocks anyway when you pull the lever, so I don't need my car unlocking all the doors the second I shift into park. I have to make a conscious effort to relock the door until I am ready to unlock them. Many times I will drop someone at the door and park where I sit and wait for them. The door locks are one more layer of protection, and it bothers me that the manufacturers have designed it to open the car up to a similar event every time you park.
     
    Top Bottom