There was a very good discussion on another board about the compromises made in a shortened 1911. It was mainly in slide timing and recoil spring life. Recoil springs need changed in a shorter 1911 much earlier than in a full size. For instance, my RIA Compact has a single recoil spring that needs changed every 400 rounds. My full size Springfield gets new springs between 3000 and 5000 rounds. My Kimber Ultra Carry has nested recoil springs and can go 1500 rounds between spring changes.
The RIA spring I'm using right now is a Wilson Combat 24# and cost about $8, so the short spring life is not a problem cost wise. I did start getting FTF with the original spring at around the 500 round mark, which went away with the spring change.
Also, compact 1911s are said to be more sensitive to tired magazines. I think that's part of the slide timing issues. I've been trying to find the original thread, but am having no luck yet.
You are right on the money, the slide velocity on a 3 inch 1911 is pretty high. It is approaching the side of physics where you are really going to have to have everything in sych.
I have an ultra Kimber, the ultra and micro sized guns need stiff mag springs to get the next round into place as quickly as possible. also the recoil springs do tired very quickly compared to a full size 1911.
On the positive side you cant beat the concealability and firepower out of a compact .45 if it will run reliability.