Drunk drivers wreck

[hoosierdoc]

Lawsuit Claims Drunken Sex at 85 mph | NBC Washington

They should not have been drinking

 

[Benny]

“At the time of the collision, Defendant was going 85 miles per hour.” (Paragraph 10)
“At the time of the collision, Defendant was having sex with a female.” (Paragraph 12)
“At the time of the collision, Defendant was driving admittedly drunk.” (Paragraph 13)
“At the time of the accident, Defendant was partially or totally in the backseat of the car.” (Paragraph 14)

 

[jd4320t]

good thing he wasn't texting too...

 

[E5RANGER375]

should have been wearing protection and all would have been fine.

 

[Naptown]

"And there was a third passenger in the car at the time of the crash, and he also denies driving."

WTF was this guy doing? Fine, I know what he was doing, but why didn't he offer to drive.

 

[gunman41mag]

Simple put him in jail, & he'll have plenty of sex & won't be able to H U R T no one

 

[Westside]

^^^^This^^^^^

 

[KG1]

Looks to me at some point there was nobody driving the car when it was barreling down the road

 

[SirRealism]

If there's anything I hate, it's drunk ****ers driving.

 

[gunman41mag]

It's ok he was wearing a condom

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

Victimless crime, move along.

 

[NYFelon]

Victimless crime, move along.

come on, you gotta admit the guy deserves some sort of award for that level of multi-tasking.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

come on, you gotta admit the guy deserves some sort of award for that level of multi-tasking.

Maybe if it was multi-tasking that was actually productive and helpful to other members of society.

 

[88GT]

Victimless crime, move along.

Not including the collision, since that is neither unique to nor more frequent than collisions not involving alcohol, who is the victim when someone drives under the influence?

 

[Benny]

Not including the collision, since that is neither unique to nor more frequent than collisions not involving alcohol, who is the victim when someone drives under the influence?

I'd say the poor third party that probably **** himself when the driver started banging in the back seat.

 

[88GT]

I'd say the poor third party that probably **** himself when the driver started banging in the back seat.

But INGO would simply say that's a matter of playing stupid games.

 

[hoosierdoc]

Not including the collision, since that is neither unique to nor more frequent than collisions not involving alcohol, who is the victim when someone drives under the influence?

Is this tongue-in-cheek? Collisions no worse than no alcohol? Drunks run lights all night long, swipe pedestrians off sidewalks, run into houses, etc...
Are you comparing those to fender benders at red lights in the rain?

Surely this was a joke....

 

[NYFelon]

Maybe if it was multi-tasking that was actually productive and helpful to other members of society.

dude, lighten up. Maybe you were on duty and had your game face on. But is there some kind of rule against smiling on duty? The post was made in jest.

 

[femurphy77]

The dude was driving alright, just not a car! Nyuck, Nyuck, Nyuck.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

dude, lighten up. Maybe you were on duty and had your game face on. But is there some kind of rule against smiling on duty? The post was made in jest.

No I wasn't on duty.