I’ve always wondered why the CO’s are granted this much power. No search warrant required - even when going on privately owned land. Is it because we are hunting the King’s deer ? That is, the State of Indiana’s deer ?
I once had a discussion with a CO about what was required to satisfy the written permission requirement re: hunting on someone else’s land. I asked if I had a written and signed statement from the landowner if the signature need to be notarized ? What proof did I need that the person signing the permission slip was the actual owner of the mane ? The reply I got was that a notary of the signature wasn’t a requirement but would be better. Re: proof of who actually owned the land, the CO stated he could push it as far as he chose to - up to and including requiring a copy of a recorded deed from the county recorder’s office. Seemed a little over the top to me.
If someone is asking for that much proof, they either hate you, or need to be knocked off their high horse! A hand written, signed note from a landowner is all that is needed. Some people type up a more formal letter including a hold harmless release. That is more so the landowner feels comfortable allowing someone to hunt their land.