Ebola on the horizon?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    I thought I'd share some information from my source and what it means. It appears there are more than few employees at that hospital that are living in the building until they pass the quarantine time for the disease. They did not want to take it home. The rumor mill was that 20 to 30 secret infections were in the hospital, but in reality they were people that did not want to risk infecting their families.

    Either is it transmittable between casual contact or it's not. With the exception of marital relations, how many family members are in such close contact, let alone contact with each others' bodily fluids, that merely living in the same residence as them is a risk? This is somewhat rhetorical, since we know that several of the cases in Africa were transmitted between family members who had no more contact with each other than sharing a bed or eating at the same table.

    It may not be "airborne" like the flu, but it doesn't require a bath in someone's blood or vomit either.
     

    singlesix

    Grandmaster
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 13, 2008
    7,229
    27
    Indianapolis, In
    Either is it transmittable between casual contact or it's not. With the exception of marital relations, how many family members are in such close contact, let alone contact with each others' bodily fluids, that merely living in the same residence as them is a risk? This is somewhat rhetorical, since we know that several of the cases in Africa were transmitted between family members who had no more contact with each other than sharing a bed or eating at the same table.

    It may not be "airborne" like the flu, but it doesn't require a bath in someone's blood or vomit either.

    Well down in parts of Kentucky ......
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana
    ABC7 Chicago reports, two unrelated passengers (one child - vomiting, no fever; one adult - nausea, diarrhea, no fever) originating from Liberia became ill en route to O'Hare International Airport. The two patients are being monitored in isolation at The University of Chicago Medical Center and Rush University Medical Center but based on the latest reports and risk exposures (from the Chicago Ebola Resource Network), the CDC has determined not to test them for Ebola.

    Chicago Hospitals Monitoring 2 Sick Passengers From Liberia, CDC Not Testing For Ebola | Zero Hedge


     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana
    ABC7 Chicago reports, two unrelated passengers (one child - vomiting, no fever; one adult - nausea, diarrhea, no fever) originating from Liberia became ill en route to O'Hare International Airport. The two patients are being monitored in isolation at The University of Chicago Medical Center and Rush University Medical Center but based on the latest reports and risk exposures (from the Chicago Ebola Resource Network), the CDC has determined not to test them for Ebola.

    Chicago Hospitals Monitoring 2 Sick Passengers From Liberia, CDC Not Testing For Ebola | Zero Hedge



    Adding some facts from the New England Journal of Medicine.
    12.9% did not have a fever (11.8% of those who died did not) - About 1 in 8 do NOT have a fever.

    23.6% did not feel fatigue (23.6% of those who died did not) - About 1 out of 4 do NOT feel fatigue.

    32.4% did not vomit (30.6% of those who died did not) - About 1 out of 3 do NOT vomit.

    34.4% did not have diarrhea (31.7% of those who died did not) - Anout 1 out of 3 do NOT have diarrhea.

    In addition:

    35.5% did not have loss of appetite (36% of those who died did not)

    46.6% did not have a headache (46.2% of those who died did not)

    55.7% did not have abdominal pain (56.5% of those who died did not)

    60.6% did not have joint pain (59.3% of those who died did not

    61.1% did not have muscle pain (59.8% of those who died did not)

    63.0% did not have chest pain (59.8% of those who died did not

    79.2% did not have conjunctivitis (red Ebola eyes) (76.4% of those who died did not)

    82.0% did not have unexplained bleeding (79.8% of those who died did not)

    29.6% of Ebola patients DO cough. And 32.5% of people who died from Ebola did develop a cough.(1 out of 3)

    Full tables and charts at the link,the paper was published 10/16/2014
    MMS: Error

    The Link to the New England Journal of Medicine works.
    Link to my thread with a speech from Michael Osterholm(head of CIDRAP Centers For Infectious Disease Research and policy)mentioning the inadequate response of the USA in monitoring only temperature as a guideline.

    https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...la-michael-osterholm-speech-10-19-2014-a.html
     

    pudly

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    13,329
    83
    Undisclosed
    And they still won't do anything to try and keep potentially infected people from coming to the US. Even if they do manage to identify someone who is sick and isolate them after arriving, all of the airplane passengers were forced to spend hours in close proximity.
     

    Thebarkus

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 25, 2012
    10
    1
    The real scare is when this death wish hits South America and we have the swarm of refugees hitting our borders. Will this then be considered a real threat?
     

    Thebarkus

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 25, 2012
    10
    1
    It's scary that my response is #666 but this is a real threat that we are facing and how will we react???
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    I don't know what an Ebola test costs or if they should have been tested.

    However, most diagnoses are best done by accurate history and clinical signs. We don't know what part of Liberia these people were in, when they were there, nor full details of their medical history.

    It is my understanding that Ebola tests often show negative early in the disease process anyway. And supposedly these people and their families are being isolated from others. So I'm not sure that an Ebola test, of whatever type, is prudent. I also don't know if there is any difficulty increasing the production of test reagents. It might be rational to do what they are doing: isolate for now and test later if needed. I don't know.
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States

    jedi

    Da PinkFather
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   0
    Oct 27, 2008
    37,870
    113
    NWI, North of US-30
    That how question is very easy. Every man, women, child on a makeshift wall with arms.
    If zombie ebola was coming from the south at the end of the day that is how it will occurs.
    The fear in the public would stop all this bs, pc and you bet when faced with zombie ebola that line will be as such.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Updated WHO numbers as of 19 Oct - 9,936 cases and 4,877 deaths. That's a daily avg. increase of 1.2%.

    Remains confined to Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia.

    Looks like we'll break 10k total by Friday's numbers. Wonder if WHO/CDC will back off of predictions of 10k/wk by the end of November.

    Reported numbers show a slowdown of infections and deaths.
     

    BigMatt

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Sep 22, 2009
    1,852
    63
    Updated WHO numbers as of 19 Oct - 9,936 cases and 4,877 deaths. That's a daily avg. increase of 1.2%.

    Remains confined to Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia.

    Looks like we'll break 10k total by Friday's numbers. Wonder if WHO/CDC will back off of predictions of 10k/wk by the end of November.

    Reported numbers show a slowdown of infections and deaths.

    There has been a slowdown of infections in some areas and an increase in others. Also, Reuters says the real infection/death toll could be much higher...

    Official WHO Ebola toll near 5,000 with true number nearer 15,000 | Reuters
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Yeah, that is a constant factor with this reporting.

    In terms of cases in new areas, I see this as similar to a grass fire. As it exhausts the place it started, it moves out. But, if you can keep it under control in the new areas, then you can control the whole thing.

    It seems like, although the geographical footprint is expanding, the actual net new cases is decreasing (reporting issues aside). We will probably never know the true number of deaths in West Africa from this outbreak. But, we can only use the numbers we're given.
     
    Top Bottom