Environmental Agenda

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • dleeharrison

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 30, 2010
    154
    16
    One prediction is that when Obama gets back in office, his employees at the US EPA will unleash pentup rules aimed at the power industry - namely coal so be prepeared to shell out more and more dollars for your energy. A number of sources have already switched from coal to natural gas due to uncertainty with the the regulatory agenda. Natural gas should be conserved for home and light industrial use while coal should be used by the utilities. The utilites have an enormous appetite for fuel and they are efficient in burning coal.

    The air in the United States has never been cleaner than it is now. The utilites have made great strides in pollution control. A number of the power plants are using western coal in order to meet sulfur dioxide rules. The EPA's Cross State Air Transport rule are based on number of studies thathave shown that the emissions form power plants cause a number of excess deaths, increased morbidity anoung the young and the old, etc. A number of these studies are conducted bt the same people who bought you global warming. It seems that the EPA's logic is that if you can detect it or measure it, it must be bad and we will prove it that it is indeed bad.

    Given the current regulatory climate, if I had an option to build a large industrial manufacturing facility in the US or overseas, I would opt to build it out of the US. There needs to be a moratorium on all environmental rules. If Obama is relected, be prepared for additional questionable rules and increased costs.
     

    Trooper

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    One prediction is that when Obama gets back in office, his employees at the US EPA will unleash pentup rules aimed at the power industry - namely coal so be prepeared to shell out more and more dollars for your energy. A number of sources have already switched from coal to natural gas due to uncertainty with the the regulatory agenda. Natural gas should be conserved for home and light industrial use while coal should be used by the utilities. The utilites have an enormous appetite for fuel and they are efficient in burning coal.

    The air in the United States has never been cleaner than it is now. The utilites have made great strides in pollution control. A number of the power plants are using western coal in order to meet sulfur dioxide rules. The EPA's Cross State Air Transport rule are based on number of studies thathave shown that the emissions form power plants cause a number of excess deaths, increased morbidity anoung the young and the old, etc. A number of these studies are conducted bt the same people who bought you global warming. It seems that the EPA's logic is that if you can detect it or measure it, it must be bad and we will prove it that it is indeed bad.

    Given the current regulatory climate, if I had an option to build a large industrial manufacturing facility in the US or overseas, I would opt to build it out of the US. There needs to be a moratorium on all environmental rules. If Obama is relected, be prepared for additional questionable rules and increased costs.

    What about those in the Progressive movement who see the masses as litle more than human pollution? Have noticed that this is becoming a very common view among college kids.

    But then the Progressives have long believed in eugenics, of weeding out the human gene pool.
     

    redneckmedic

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    8,429
    48
    Greenfield
    What about those in the Progressive movement who see the masses as litle more than human pollution? Have noticed that this is becoming a very common view among college kids.

    But then the Progressives have long believed in eugenics, of weeding out the human gene pool.

    How did you just use "weed" and "progressives" in the same sentence without talking about drugs?:n00b:
     

    netsecurity

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Oct 14, 2011
    4,201
    48
    Hancock County
    Progressives have always believed people are the scourge of the earth, with the exception of themselves. If tomorrow it was learned that human waste was the definitive cause of climate change I'd love to hear the progressives plan. I think it would sound something like this. Euthanize all conservatives, and force the rest on to vegan diets without large sodas or ice cream.
     
    Top Bottom