Taking in any, without regard to the impact on the targeted communities, is just as immoral. Those of us who can agree that both of those statements are true, really don’t disagree on much of the broader topic. I suspect that in real life, there is not such agreement, because it only seems to work one way.I think his position is a lot like mine: in favor of taking many refugees. But he can certainly speak for himself.
I was making the moral case only in response to the members in this discussion who were saying that the U.S. should never take any refugees. (But with this many people in the discussion, it's easy for that to get lost, so I needed to clarify.)
We can pleasantly debate how many to take and from which situations; Taking none is, in my view, a categorically wrong answer.