Evidence of the US Banking System Teetering on the Brink of Collapse

[raiven]

1. Paulson appears on Face The Nation and says "Our banking system is a safe and a sound one." If the banking system was safe and sound, everyone would know it (or at least think it). There would be no need to say it.

2. Paulson says the list of troubled banks "is a very manageable situation". The reality is there are 90 banks on the list of problem banks. Indymac was not one of them until a month before it collapsed. How many other banks will magically appear on the list a month before they collapse?

3. In a Northern Rock moment, depositors at Indymac pull out their cash. Police had to be called in to ensure order.

4. Washington Mutual (WM), another troubled bank, refused to honor Indymac cashier's checks. The irony is it makes no sense for customers to pull insured deposits out of Indymac after it went into receivership. The second irony is the last place one would want to put those funds would be Washington Mutual. Eventually Washington Mutual decided it would take those checks but with an 8 week hold. Will Washington Mutual even be around 8 weeks from now?

5. Paulson asked for "Congressional authority to buy unlimited stakes in and lend to Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE)" just days after he said "Financial Institutions Must Be Allowed To Fail". Obviously Paulson is reporting from the 5th dimension. In some alternate universe, his statements just might make sense.

6. Former Fed Governor William Poole says "Fannie Mae, Freddie Losses Makes Them Insolvent".

7. Paulson says Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are "essential" because they represent the only "functioning" part of the home loan market. The firms own or guarantee about half of the $12 trillion in U.S. mortgages. Is it possible to have a sound banking system when the only "functioning" part of the mortgage market is insolvent?

8. Bernanke testified before Congress on monetary policy but did not comment on either money supply or interest rates. The word "money" did not appear at all in his testimony. The only time "interest rate" appeared in his testimony was in relation to consumer credit card rates. How can you have any reasonable economic policy when the Fed chairman is scared half to death to discuss interest rates and money supply?

9. The SEC issued a protective order to protect those most responsible for naked short selling. As long as the investment banks and brokers were making money engaging in naked shorting of stocks, there was no problem. However, when the bears began using the tactic against the big financials, it became time to selectively enforce the existing regulation.

10. The Fed takes emergency actions twice during options expirations week in regards to the discount window and rate cuts.

11. The SEC takes emergency action during options expirations week regarding short sales.

12. The Fed has implemented an alphabet soup of pawn shop lending facilities whereby the Fed accepts garbage as collateral in exchange for treasuries. Those new Fed lending facilities are called the Term Auction Facility (TAF), the Term Security Lending Facility (TSLF), and the Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF).

13. Citigroup ©, Lehman (LEH), Morgan Stanley(MS), Goldman Sachs (GS) and Merrill Lynch (MER) all have a huge percentage of level 3 assets. Level 3 assets are commonly known as "marked to fantasy" assets. In other words, the value of those assets is significantly if not ridiculously overvalued in comparison to what those assets would fetch on the open market. It is debatable if any of the above firms survive in their present form. Some may not survive in any form.

14. Bernanke openly solicits private equity firms to invest in banks. Is this even close to a remotely normal action for Fed chairman to take?

15. Bear Stearns was taken over by JPMorgan (JPM) days after insuring investors it had plenty of capital. Fears are high that Lehman will suffer the same fate. Worse yet, the Fed had to guarantee the shotgun marriage between Bear Stearns and JP Morgan by providing as much as $30 billion in capital. JPMorgan is responsible for only the first 1/2 billion. Taxpayers are on the hook for all the rest. Was this a legal action for the Fed to take? Does the Fed care?

16. Citigroup needed a cash injection from Abu Dhabi and a second one elsewhere. Then after announcing it would not need more capital is raising still more. The latest news is Citigroup will sell $500 billion in assets. To who? At what price?

17. Merrill Lynch raised $6.6 billion in capital from Kuwait Mizuho, announced it did not need to raise more capital, then raised more capital a few week later.

18. Morgan Stanley sold a 9.9% equity stake to China International Corp. CEO John Mack compensated by not taking his bonus. How generous. Morgan Stanley fell from $72 to $37. Did CEO John Mack deserve a paycheck at all?

19. Bank of America (BAC) agreed to take over Countywide Financial (CFC) and twice announced Countrywide will add profits to B of A. Inquiring minds were asking "How the hell can Countrywide add to Bank of America earnings?" Here's how. Bank of America just announced it will not guarantee $38.1 billion in Countrywide debt. Questions over "Fraudulent Conveyance" are now surfacing.

20. Washington Mutual agreed to a death spiral cash infusion of $7 billion accepting an offer at $8.75 when the stock was over $13 at the time. Washington Mutual has since fallen in waterfall fashion from $40 and is now trading near $5.00 after a huge rally.

21. Shares of Ambac (ABK) fell from $90 to $2.50. Shares of MBIA (MBI) fell from $70 to $5. Sadly, the top three rating agencies kept their rating on the pair at AAA nearly all the way down. No one can believe anything the government sponsored rating agencies say.

22. In a panic set of moves, the Fed slashed interest rates from 5.25% to 2%. This was the fastest, steepest drop on record. Ironically, the Fed chairman spoke of inflation concerns the entire drop down. Bernanke clearly cannot tell the truth. He does not have to. Actions speak louder than words.

23. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said the FDIC is looking for ways to shore up its depleted deposit fund, including charging higher premiums on riskier brokered deposits.

24. There is roughly $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits. $2.60 Trillion of that is uninsured. There is only $53 billion in FDIC insurance to cover $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits. Indymac will eat up roughly $8 billion of that.

25. Of the $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits, the total cash on hand at banks is a mere $273.7 Billion. Where is the rest of the loot? The answer is in off balance sheet SIVs, imploding commercial real estate deals, Alt-A liar loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds, toggle bonds where debt is amazingly paid back with more debt, and all sorts of other silly (and arguably fraudulent) financial wizardry schemes that have bank and brokerage firms leveraged at 30-1 or more. Those loans cannot be paid back.

What cannot be paid back will be defaulted on. If you did not know it before, you do now. The entire US banking system is insolvent.
By Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article5594.html

 

[indyjoe]

I've tried to convert my money to ammo.

 

[raiven]

that would be the best soultion at this point since cash is failing to buy food, when its better to just shoot it with 1 bullet to eat.

 

[RogerB]

same here....but I'm going with jelly beans and bullets....sweet tooth and all that ya know.

 

[raiven]

Reuters is reporting WaMu has $3.33 bln loss, may be cut to "junk" .
Washington Mutual Inc, the largest U.S. savings and loan, posted a $3.33 billion second-quarter loss on Tuesday as souring mortgages forced it to set aside more money for loan losses.

"We are planning for continued softness in housing for the next several quarters," Chief Executive Kerry Killinger said in an interview. "The capital that we have in place is sufficient to manage through this period. We have no plans at this point to raise additional capital."





Washington Mutual said its mortgage unit lost $1.35 billion in the second quarter, while retail banking posted a $2.04 billion loss. Credit cards generated a $175 million loss, while profit in commercial banking fell 29 percent to $87 million.

Washington Mutual also said that Killinger, Chief Operating Officer Steve Rotella and Chief Financial Officer Tom Casey will not receive annual incentive payments under a company bonus plan, in light of its performance in 2008.
What a travesty of justice! It's not easy to lose money in nearly every phase of operations. One might think that such performance would be rewarded. But no! In an amazing superhuman sacrifice the CEO, CFO, and COO of WaMu will all decline bonuses.

Plans To Raise Capital vs. Need To Raise Capital

It is interesting how statements like " We have no plans to raise capital " can get completely distorted from reality.

Check out this bullish Comment about Washington Mutual I found on Yahoo: " No Need to Raise Capital....... Very Bullish. Long till 2012 ".

Here is the reality.

WaMu "Can't Raise Capital"

Please consider Washington Mutual Drop Wipes Out Most of TPG Holding .
Three months ago, with Washington Mutual's shares at $13.15, a group of investors led by Forth Worth, Texas-based TPG agreed to buy $7 billion of stock at $8.75, a 33 percent discount.

As losses mount, a clause in the TPG agreement makes it more costly for WaMu to raise capital or be acquired. If WaMu is sold for less than $8.75 a share or is forced to raise more than $500 million in equity, it must compensate TPG for the difference, according to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

"We don't know how their investment plays out, but we also don't know how this affects WaMu to the extent they need to raise more capital," said Steven Davidoff, law professor at Wayne State University Law School in Detroit. "They really can't raise equity."
Death Spiral Financing

It is now time to explore the implications of the desperate deal that Washington Mutual made with TPG. Please consider Lack of Transparency = Shareholders Get Ratcheted .

Following are a few highlights from the above lengthy, but well written article. I condensed this down as best as I can but inquiring minds will definitely want to read the entire article.
Even though hundreds of billions of dollars of capital have been raised by the financial sector over the past several months, which of the investors in a financial institution have made money since their initial investment? Answer: Zero.

We can't think of one. They are all underwater. When Abu Dhabi first invested $7.5 billion in Citigroup last November, Citi's stock was $35. Subsequently, when Citi did their $14.5 billion raise in January, the stock was trading at $30. Today Citigroup's stock is under $20... and it keeps falling. Merrill Lynch did a combined raise of $12.8 billion in December and January at $48. Now the stock is under $35… and also falling. Warburg Pinkus made their now infamous $1 billion investment in MBIA at $31 per share. MBIA has fallen over 80% since and is now trading at under $5 per share.

Those who participated in Ambac's $1.5 billion rights issue in March are down a similar amount, 80%, as the stock now hovers under $2. Bank of America made their initial investment in Countrywide Financial last August at $18 per share (rather surprising to us, given that Countrywide looked to be going bankrupt if BofA didn't come to the rescue). Bank of America subsequently made a takeover offer in January. Today Countrywide shares can be got for under $5 per share.

TPG invested in Washington Mutual to the tune of $7 billion at $8.75 per share, a substantial discount at the time to WaMu's stock price of $13. Today WaMu's stock is $6. Last month AIG raised $20 billion when their stock was trading at $37 per share. Today AIG stock is just above $30 per share. Even those who participated in Lehman Brothers' $6 billion equity offering last week at $28 per share are already underwater, with LEH currently trading below $24 (year-to-date Lehman's stock is down over 60%).

Ironically, thanks to full ratchet provisions, this promises to lead to further dilution and even weaker stock performance going forward.

There were at least some smart investors who noted the downward trend and successfully negotiated for downside protection. We know of at least two cases (though there are doubtless others); namely, Merrill Lynch's $12.8 billion investment from Temasek (the Singapore sovereign wealth fund) and Washington Mutual's $7 billion raise from TPG (a private equity firm).

Quite unbeknownst to the general public at the time, downside protection was built into these equity raises to protect these investors. They are called “look back” provisions or “full ratchet” compensation.

We believe it is more accurate to call them “death spiral” securities. They work as follows. The investors in the equity raise would have their investment “protected” by a provision which states that should the bank afterwards raise money at a lower price than what they paid, these investors would be compensated retroactively by having their initial investment priced at this lower price, thereby being issued new shares for free. It doesn't take a mathematician to see how these provisions can result in massive dilution should the bank subsequently raise even a paltry amount of capital. A new offering will trigger a lower price because of the dilution it would cause, which would trigger even more dilution because of the lower price, which would then trigger an even lower price because of the even higher dilution, etc. This is why we call such securities a death spiral.

However, unless the bank goes bankrupt, these investors can't lose. And we already know to what lengths the Fed will go to prevent a banking bankruptcy. It's heads I win, tails I win.

They can even short the stock in the expectation that it will go down and still not lose. At the next financing, which is sure to come, they will be made whole... even making money on the short!
Add Citigroup To Those In Death Spiral Financing

The above article mentioned Merrill Lynch and Washington Mutual in death spiral financing schemes. Add Citigroup to the list. I talked about this way back on January 15, 2008 in Cost of Capital "Ratchets Up" at Citigroup and Merrill .

Is it any wonder that Citigroup is desperate to dump $500 billion in assets? The saving grace for Citigroup is that it has assets to dump. The big question is ho much those assets will fetch. I believe it will be far less that Citigroup thinks. I am still sticking to my estimate that Citigroup will survive, just nowhere remotely close to its current state.

Now take a good hard look at WaMu. It is losing money at nearly everything it does. It is in deep serial trouble over Alt-A loans alone.

With that in mind, many have been asking for an update on the WaMu Alt-A pool I have been tracking. The article has been out for some time. The title is certainly not obvious, and those who missed the update can find it in Fannie and Freddie Waterfalls Are Too Big to Bail .

Desperation At WaMu

Think about the implications of a company either desperate enough or dumb enough to issues $billions in shares at $8.75 when the stock was over $13 at the time. The ratchet provisions made it likely those in the deal immediately shorted it. Even if there were short restrictions, there are ways to execute synthetic shorts (writing deep in the money covered calls for example).

Even if TPG took no action on its own accord, others understanding the implications of the ratchet agreements WaMu agreed to, probably shorted the hell out of it. Any company that desperate or that stupid deserved to be shorted into oblivion.

The CEO, CFO, and COO all ought to get fired for agreeing such terms as well as for not seeing the need to raise capital until shares fell to $13. Then again, those executives paid the ultimate sacrifice of foregoing their bonus for a quarter.

WaMu Is Screwed

Washington Mutual is screwed. It cannot raise capital by equity deals even if it wants to. Those who translated " We have no plans to raise capital " into " No Need to Raise Capital" are sadly mistaken.

WaMu desperately needs to raise capital. However, those death spiral financing arrangements it made means WaMu can't raise capital. And if WaMu can't raise capital, it stands to reason it would have no plans to do so.
By Mike "Mish" Shedlock
Death Spiral Financing at Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, WaMu... :: The Market Oracle :: Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting Free Website

 

[raiven]

just keeps getting better and better.


FDIC takes over two more failed banks 28 branches scheduled to reopen Monday as Mutual of Omaha Bank Carson City Sheriff's detective David LeGros locks the door at 1st National Bank of Nevada on Friday, July 25, after federal regulators closed the bank.
updated 1 hour, 5 minutes ago function UpdateTimeStamp UpdateTimeStampY, Nev. - U.S. regulators took over two banks on Friday and sold them to Mutual of Omaha Bank, the sixth and seventh bank failures this year as financial institutions struggle with a housing bust and credit crunch.

Two weeks after the Federal Deposit isurance Corp seized IndyMac Bancorp Inc., the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said it closed First National Bank of Nevada and First Heritage Bank NA of California.

First National, characterized as undercapitalized, had total assets of $3.4 billion and $3 billion in deposits. First Heritage, described as critically undercapitalized, had assets of $254 million and $233 million in deposits, regulators said.


Bill Uffelman of the Nevada Bankers Association said Friday the FDIC action “is a reflection of the times for the banks. It’s a poor economy.â€

Uffelman cautioned against the sort of consumer concern that prompted many customers of IndyMac Bank branches to wait for hours in line to withdraw funds across Southern California last week after that bank was seized by federal regulators. All FDIC-insured bank deposits are guaranteed by the FDIC up to $100,000, he noted.

Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons said the bank takeover will be closely monitored in Nevada “to ensure there’s minimal disruption to business and that employees’ jobs are protected as much as possible.â€

The FDIC said the cost of the transactions to its insurance fund is estimated to be $862 million, adding that the two failed banks represent just 0.3 percent of $13.4 trillion in total industry assets at about 8,500 FDIC-insured institutions.

The FDIC said the 28 offices of the two banks will reopen on Monday as Mutual of Omaha Bank. Over the weekend, customers can access their money by writing checks, using automatic teller machines or debit cards.

Mutual of Omaha Bank currently has more than $750 million in assets and operates 14 retail branches in Nebraska and Colorado with commercial lending offices in Dallas and Des Moines, Iowa, the FDIC said.

It is a subsidiary of Mutual of Omaha, a 99-year-old insurance and financial services company with more than $19 billion in total assets.

Warnings of more failures
Top banking regulators have warned of additional insolvencies this year and next, but for now do not expect failures the size of IndyMac, which had $32 billion in assets and $19 billion in total deposits at the end of March.

IndyMac, the third largest U.S. bank failure, was regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision and is expected to deplete the FDIC's insurance fund by between $4 billion and $8 billion.

IndyMac is being run by the FDIC while the agency looks to sell its assets.

The FDIC oversees an industry-funded reserve of about $53 billion used to insure up to $100,000 per deposit and $250,000 per individual retirement account at insured banks.

The agency also has a running tally of problem banks that its examiners closely monitor. At the end of the first quarter, 90 institutions were on the list that is expected to be updated next month.

First Heritage of Newport Beach, California, had three branches with customers comprised mostly of corporations, while First National of Reno, Nevada, had 25 branches. Both were owned by First National Bank Holding Co of Scottsdale, Arizona.

In addition to assuming all the deposits, Mutual of Omaha Bank will purchase about $200 million of assets and pay the FDIC a 4.41 premium to assume the deposits.

None of the entities are publicly traded.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25857049

 

[Justus]

Australian investors wrote off 90% of the value of US mortgages
held in their portfolios.

"The National Australia Bank's decision to write off 90 per cent of its US conduit loans will have dramatic repercussions around the world. Wall Street will be deeply shocked when they understand the repercussions of what NAB has done. It is clear global banks have nowhere near provided for their exposures to US housing loans which in the words of John Stewart are experiencing a “meltdown”.

Business Spectator - NAB will shock Wall Street

 

[ryanmercer]

It's no worse now than it was in the 80's.

 

[CarmelHP]

It's no worse now than it was in the 80's.

Actually, I think it is. If you're referring to the S&L collapse, that was very limited, to just that particular segment of the banking industry. This extends to huge GSEs, to global banks, to the securities market, and is tied to another ticking time bomb, the massive credit card industry. All of this debt, which has fed off each other, and now is becoming unserviceable, threatens to topple the entire banking system worldwide. If we see Carter-era style unemployment and interest rates, then things could spiral quickly out of control.

 

[ryanmercer]

Actually, I think it is. If you're referring to the S&L collapse, that was very limited, to just that particular segment of the banking industry. This extends to huge GSEs, to global banks, to the securities market, and is tied to another ticking time bomb, the massive credit card industry. All of this debt, which has fed off each other, and now is becoming unserviceable, threatens to topple the entire banking system worldwide. If we see Carter-era style unemployment and interest rates, then things could spiral quickly out of control.

Yeah but I don't see it on the brink of collapse... yes it is bad, yes things need to be immediately done... and the banks are... a lot of people have noticed credit limit reductions down to their current balance or within a few hundred dollars on LOTS of lines of credit (lots of talk about it on CreditBoards (Powered by Invision Power Board) a really good forum, and site) as well as other things. It really needs to be on EVERYONE though. We've got 20 something year olds out there with credit limits close to a quarter of a million dollars... that are making 25-30k a year.

I wouldn't mind seeing it collapse though... sure things would be real rough, but hey I"m prepared. I've got my food supply, my guns, and my ammunition... only thing I don't have is a water supply (well), but I know places I could go where an extra trigger finger and work-hand would be welcomed that do have water supplies.

 

[CarmelHP]

I wouldn't mind seeing it collapse though... sure things would be real rough, but hey I"m prepared.

I don't think you have any concept of what life would be like. It may sound romantic, but it would be ugly.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Very ugly.

So, if a restaurant fails then it is it evidence of the American restaurant system collapsing?

The problem is that not enough banks are failing and that the country is privatizing profit and socializing losses.

 

[Justus]

I don't think you have any concept of what life would be like. It may sound romantic, but it would be ugly.

+1

there's nothing romantic about a collapse.
We can only imagine how bad it would be.
Zimbabwe is going thru an economic collapse right now.

 

[SavageEagle]

Yes, I can imagine just how bad the collapse would be. LA Riots all over the Nation. Famine. Corporations leave the Country to make a bigger profit overseas. A security breakdown worse than 9/11. Governmental collapse because the people lose faith, money runs out, revolt, etc. It could be real bad. We could what-if all day long, but maybe a collapse is just what this corrupt system needs. There's no way we can fix this without it costing those who had no hand in making this happen. I don't have stocks, bonds, loans(beside a student loan), etc. I didn't buy a house or car under a bad loan. Why should I help bail these corrupt bankers out? How about the Millions of other Americans that had no hand in this? Why should we all suffer because of the greed of a few? Yes I feel bad for those middle class who lose out but they should have read the fine print. You don't sign nothing unless you understand EVERYTHING you are getting into. Simple as that. Heaven forbid worst case scenarios happen(riots, governmental collapse), but no amount of government interferance is going to stop this. The banks themselves can only delay the inevitable. These banks are going to go under. People are going to go to jail. It will happen. Mark my words.

 

[ryanmercer]

I don't think you have any concept of what life would be like. It may sound romantic, but it would be ugly.

Um, I spent 6 months living at a commune, where everything was grown... bunking with a bunch of other people... I know EXACTLY what life would be like.

 

[flagtag]

Yeah but I don't see it on the brink of collapse... yes it is bad, yes things need to be immediately done... and the banks are... a lot of people have noticed credit limit reductions down to their current balance or within a few hundred dollars on LOTS of lines of credit (lots of talk about it on CreditBoards (Powered by Invision Power Board) a really good forum, and site) as well as other things. It really needs to be on EVERYONE though. We've got 20 something year olds out there with credit limits close to a quarter of a million dollars... that are making 25-30k a year.

I wouldn't mind seeing it collapse though... sure things would be real rough, but hey I"m prepared. I've got my food supply, my guns, and my ammunition... only thing I don't have is a water supply (well), but I know places I could go where an extra trigger finger and work-hand would be welcomed that do have water supplies.

Sometimes it IS best - if a house is so delapidated - to tear it down and rebuild. Start anew, clean up, move on.

 

[CarmelHP]

Um, I spent 6 months living at a commune, where everything was grown... bunking with a bunch of other people... I know EXACTLY what life would be like.

And after 6 months, you got to walk out. No children starving or riots. There is no comparison.

 

[ryanmercer]

And after 6 months, you got to walk out. No children starving or riots. There is no comparison.

I didn't say the outside world would be peachy... I said I know what life without all this modern convenience crap would be like... and quite honestly I'd go for it in a heart beat... if I had the fortune it'd require to buy enough land for it to work out and set aside a trust to pay taxes... I'd do it in a heartbeat.

 

[SavageEagle]

**** this whole Country needs a good kick in the rear and a fresh start to boot. There are too many corrupt people running this Country, too many loopholes, too many different people doing the same jobs in government, just so much crap this Country has to put up with that we shouldn't have to. We are so afraid to upset a certain group that we bend over backward not to, only to offend everyone else. When will it end? When will the Country stand up and say enough is enough...

 

[flagtag]

**** this whole Country needs a good kick in the rear and a fresh start to boot. There are too many corrupt people running this Country, too many loopholes, too many different people doing the same jobs in government, just so much crap this Country has to put up with that we shouldn't have to. We are so afraid to upset a certain group that we bend over backward not to, only to offend everyone else. When will it end? When will the Country stand up and say enough is enough...