"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to HoughMade again"
You cannot go wrong with Ron Swanson!
Fargo, T.Lex, and Mr. Hough have explained this well, IMHO.
Up yours Freeman!
Now to log off for lent before he can respond.
No, I give up beer for Lent. Not drinking, but just beer. I like beer.So you gave up INGO so you can continue drinking beer?
Up yours Freeman!
Now to log off for lent before he can respond.
The casual observer will note that rhino has uncharacteristically chosen to "stay in his lane" on this topic and notes that the choices is not universal.
The casual observer will note that rhino has uncharacteristically chosen to "stay in his lane" on this topic and notes that the choices is not universal.
So noted! However, staying in one's own lane is not required, expected, or practiced regularly on INGO! You are commended.
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6....if in doubt, shoot to kill.
So noted! However, staying in one's own lane is not required, expected, or practiced regularly on INGO! You are commended.
Commended? NO, judged! It's not as much fun when everyone stays in his or her lane!
Geez, would you people please define your terms? Contrary to the OP, “Fear” is not limited by definition to an emotion.
In a ton of contexts, it simply means a belief. “I fear the Rams will not be able to best the Patriots.” is not an emotional statement.
That is why the courts have used the word “fear” in the context of self-defense going way back to the common law. It just means you believe that someone is going to kill or hurt you. The reasonableness of that belief is a different question.
Your term is not defined in the law the way you think it is.
You have to believe someone is going to kill or hurt you. It has to be a reasonable belief you can articulate. Fear has nothing to do with it.
In the end, people (LEO and non-LEO alike) need to explain the specific details, facts, and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person (LEO and/or non-LEO) to believe that deadly force was necessary. Keywords...SPECIFIC DETAILS, FACTS, and CIRCUMSTANCES... You are not going to get away with "I feared for my life" and leave it at that. It bothers me that people think that is all LEO's have to say to make a shoot justified. Their ignorance of basic legal concepts is astonishing.
Well, assuming arguendo that your fear (aka belief) is reasonable then, yes, that is all you need to justify self-defense, including deadly force.
Fear is not an emotion, it is the term of art for belief since before my family was kicked out of England after the War of Devolution.
fearDictionary result for fear
/ˈfir/
noun
[COLOR=#878787 !important]
- 1.
an unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous, likely to cause pain, or a threat.
And no, it's not all you need.
[/COLOR]
Ability, opportunity, intent? What is this? LFI? And it was AOJ, nothing to do with intent.
Geez, no, AOJ is not controlling. It is the subjective-objective test of reasonableness of the defendant who is purporting self-defense that is controlling.
LFI? AOJ?.....WTF? LOL?
So everyone on the range with me be advised you have the ability, opportunity and intent to cause sbi or death. I shall act accordingly.
Your term is not defined in the law the way you think it is.
Your training is not what you think it is.