VUPDblue
Silencers Have NEVER Been Illegal !
Wonder what the FOP's position is on this bill.
I bet they don't support it. I know I don't.
Wonder what the FOP's position is on this bill.
While in some, more violent countries, people actually use armor to PROTECT their children.
Just more proof it's not about the children.
I bet they don't support it. I know I don't.
Because the LA bank robber case has nothing to do with the stigma of the peasants owning body armor.
National or local? If local, which lodge?Wonder what the FOP's position is on this bill.
Wonder what the FOP's position is on this bill.
No surprise.Go figure. The Fraternal Order of Police endorses this bill.
They have no problem stripping Americans of other constitutional rights, why should we be surprised?
Responsible Body Armor Possession Act Keeps Military Armor out of the Wrong Hands | Congressman Mike Honda
Rep. Mike Honda Introduces Bill Banning Civilians from Buying Body Armor | NBC Bay Area
LOGIC!!!!!!!!!It's already illegal to use while committing a crime in Indiana right? Why not just pass that law in every state and BAM, problem solved!
At last something ALL of us can agree upon. Now let's up the ante: let's have someone introduce a bill REQUIRING every citizen to own AND wear body armor at all times.
Like healthcare?
That's a crazy idea.What we REALLY need is for someone in Congress to introduce a bill making it illegal for criminals to break the law.
That would pretty much get the whole issue solved.
It's already illegal to use while committing a crime in Indiana right? Why not just pass that law in every state and BAM, problem solved!
Because that's not the "problem" that they are attempting to solve.
Read the congressman's own headline again:
Responsible Body Armor Possession Act Keeps Military Armor out of the Wrong Hands | Congressman Mike Honda
("The wrong hands" means any hands that don't belong to the government.)
Its not about cracking down on criminals. Its about cracking down on us.
I'm sure it's "all about the children" somehow.
Not that I HAVE body armor, of course. Why would a law-abiding citizen need that? This is purely hypothetical.