Federal Judge Upholds CT Ban

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,045
    113
    Mitchell
    That's a shame. How a thinking person can expect that when only law abiding people will comply with these laws, any sort of balance between safety and the 2A right can be struck is ludicrous.
     

    eric001

    Vaguely well-known member
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Apr 3, 2011
    1,863
    149
    Indianapolis
    That a federal judge sees no problem with infringing on the 2nd Amendment so long as the people still have access to SOME firearms in their homes saddens me no end.

    If this mis-educated judge had comparable training as an electrician, he would have electrocuted himself years ago.
     

    MisterChester

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 25, 2013
    3,383
    48
    The Compound
    "While the act burdens the plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights, it is substantially related to the important governmental interest of public safety and crime control."

    This is scary. "While this trumps your constitutional right, THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!"
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,107
    113
    "...not impermissibly vague...?"

    Wow, there's a high standard for you.

    I find it interesting handguns are now apparently enshrined as the "Constitutionally untouchable" firearm by the SCOTUS, when their abolition had been the entire focus of the gun-control movement from the 80s backward, especially in the wake of the RFK assassination, GCA68, etc.

    But then again...back in those days, antidepressants weren't being prescribed to children as young as 6, either. Isn't it amazing how one, little pharmaceutical development helps completely change the complexion of society, and the outlines of the gun control debate along with it? We start giving a pill to kids we can't control...and a whole new class of firearm erupts as "Public Enemy #1."
     

    Slapstick

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 29, 2010
    4,221
    149
    Actually I think it's called "passing the buck". Any decission he handed down was going to be appealed but by not hearing oral arguments he just about guaranteed it will get a court date on a higher level. Of course it would have been nice of he would have ruled the CT ban unconstitutional but a Federal Judge is still a politician first and jurist second, (or third or fourth......).
     
    Top Bottom