If he did truly know that the man could not own a gun, then he deserves what he gets.
If he did truly know that the man could not own a gun, then he deserves what he gets.
I agree, but how do you prove this either way? I'm pretty sure here in the good old USA we are presumed innocent until proven guilty? Which begs the question: If I am presumed innocent, why am I sitting in jail waiting for a group of people to prove differently?If he did truly know that the man could not own a gun, then he deserves what he gets.
According to the statement from the U.S. attorney's office, 40-year-old Scott Griffy sold gunman Shaun Seeley a 9 mm handgun even though he knew Seeley was a convicted felon.