blackenedman
Marksman
- Apr 12, 2008
- 287
- 28
Had my first experience with jury duty yesterday. Marion county, criminal trial.
Didn't know what to expect, but had a feeling that I would likely be dismissed due to some employment history (previous l.e. and public safety comms). I filled out the survey truthfully, and honestly. After several direct questions from both attorneys, I was selected, much to my surprise. One male defendant, only one charge, explained to us as "Prohibited person in possession of a firearm, IC 35-47-4-5".
We were given our preliminary instructions, then we heard testimony from two IMPD officers (not sure if I should name them - they provided what I thought was excellent testimony, and I plan on writing a brief atta-boy to submit to the dept.) and viewed physical and photographic evidence. The defense offered no witness testimony, nor did they enter any evidence.
The deliberation process began with the rest of my peer jurors selecting me as fore-person, which came as a surprise as well. I won't dive too much into deliberations, but will say, it was harder than I expected. I'm not exactly sure how long the deliberation process took, they confiscated all electronic devices, and time was a little bit of a blur in that cramped little room.
In the end, we returned a unanimous decision of Guilty. A few minutes after returning to the jury room, the Judge joined us, thanked us for our service, and explained a little further about the case. IANAL, so I'm not exactly sure of the logisitics, or particulars of the case, but it was explained that this was sort-of a trial-within-a-trial (am I even close on that, INGO atty's?). The defendant apparently had other gun charges pending, and somehow managed to get a separate jury trial for this one charge (35-47-4-5). Am I correct in understanding that a guilty verdict on this charge would allow the State to pursue a more serious charge?
Overall, it was a very positive experience. The Court and its staff, the Prosecuting attorneys, and testifying police officers were nothing but professional in the execution of their duties. My sincere thanks to IMPD, the Court and its staff, the Prosecuting attorneys, and my fellow jurors...
Didn't know what to expect, but had a feeling that I would likely be dismissed due to some employment history (previous l.e. and public safety comms). I filled out the survey truthfully, and honestly. After several direct questions from both attorneys, I was selected, much to my surprise. One male defendant, only one charge, explained to us as "Prohibited person in possession of a firearm, IC 35-47-4-5".
We were given our preliminary instructions, then we heard testimony from two IMPD officers (not sure if I should name them - they provided what I thought was excellent testimony, and I plan on writing a brief atta-boy to submit to the dept.) and viewed physical and photographic evidence. The defense offered no witness testimony, nor did they enter any evidence.
The deliberation process began with the rest of my peer jurors selecting me as fore-person, which came as a surprise as well. I won't dive too much into deliberations, but will say, it was harder than I expected. I'm not exactly sure how long the deliberation process took, they confiscated all electronic devices, and time was a little bit of a blur in that cramped little room.
In the end, we returned a unanimous decision of Guilty. A few minutes after returning to the jury room, the Judge joined us, thanked us for our service, and explained a little further about the case. IANAL, so I'm not exactly sure of the logisitics, or particulars of the case, but it was explained that this was sort-of a trial-within-a-trial (am I even close on that, INGO atty's?). The defendant apparently had other gun charges pending, and somehow managed to get a separate jury trial for this one charge (35-47-4-5). Am I correct in understanding that a guilty verdict on this charge would allow the State to pursue a more serious charge?
Overall, it was a very positive experience. The Court and its staff, the Prosecuting attorneys, and testifying police officers were nothing but professional in the execution of their duties. My sincere thanks to IMPD, the Court and its staff, the Prosecuting attorneys, and my fellow jurors...