that and dependability.
I believe the small polymer frame Kahrs (PM9/40) are really pushing the edge of the size/reliability envelope and seem to suffer a far higher number of issues than their full-size counterparts.
I have several Glocks and one Kahr. Both are excellent guns. Kahrs come at a significantly higher price for the equivalent gun. I doubt there is much difference in the matter of holding value, but I'm sure others can speak to this better than I. I'm not really much of a trader.
Glocks are highly reliable. Kahrs have a good reputation, but there's no way they can be MORE reliable than Glocks. They are probably not any LESS reliable, either.
I'd say you should just please yourself.
If I could trade my CW9 for a 26 right now, I would, my CW9 isa great pistol for me size wise, I just like the Glock better
it seems to me Kahr is leading the pack in deep concealment non-.380 handguns.
If Glock ever makes a small single-stack 9mm/.40, I will have 2 Kahrs for sale.
Conversely, if Kahr ever makes a gun with a "safe action" style trigger, I will have 2 DAO Kahrs for sale.
I like the Kahrs for what they are and for the niche they fill, but I'm still a Glock guy at the core.
If Glock ever makes a small single-stack 9mm/.40, I will have 2 Kahrs for sale.
Conversely, if Kahr ever makes a gun with a "safe action" style trigger, I will have 2 DAO Kahrs for sale.
I like the Kahrs for what they are and for the niche they fill, but I'm still a Glock guy at the core.
If Glock ever makes a small single-stack 9mm/.40, I will have 2 Kahrs for sale.
Conversely, if Kahr ever makes a gun with a "safe action" style trigger, I will have 2 DAO Kahrs for sale.
I like the Kahrs for what they are and for the niche they fill, but I'm still a Glock guy at the core.
I don't know if I'd go that far. They are a serious contender with a good product, but the price is a big turn-off to a lot of folks. Having the CW series at a lower price point has certainly helped, but I still sell MANY more Taurus 709s and Kel-Tec PF9s than I do Kahrs.
I'm still learning, can you explain the difference in Glock's "safe action" trigger vs. Kahr's DAO?????
Kahr's are, indeed, pricey. My PM9 was an expensive gun... but it sure feels well made and extremely tight. Racking that friggin slide was no fun for the first hundred rounds!
In my thread on trying to choose between the Walther PPS and the Kahr PM I discussed the trigger. Basically the Kahr has a very long and heavyish trigger. The reset was long too. The Glock's trigger is longer than a 1911s or other single action triggers, but it's still relatively short as it's not a true double action trigger.