House And Senate Pass To Block Biden’s ESG Rule.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,441
    149
    Earth
    Someone help me understand the danger of allowing fund managers to pick what companies they invest in. From what I can tell this doesn't force the fund to prioritize ESG scores when evaluating a company, it only says that they can. How does this impact the average investor who can pick and choose which funds to put their money in? Doesn't this allow for more free market choice?

    Am I missing something?
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,111
    113
    Someone help me understand the danger of allowing fund managers to pick what companies they invest in. From what I can tell this doesn't force the fund to prioritize ESG scores when evaluating a company, it only says that they can. How does this impact the average investor who can pick and choose which funds to put their money in? Doesn't this allow for more free market choice?

    Am I missing something?
    I guess I'm missing something, too. What exactly is preventing them from doing it now? There is quite a lack of details in the reporting around this issue. And that's where the proverbial devil seems to lie. I know there are states like Florida who are legislatively preventing their own state fund managers from prioritizing politics in investment decisions. Is the Labor Dept. rule attempting to block state law? I have no idea, and the media seems to have no interest in educating us.
     

    oze

    Mow Ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 26, 2018
    3,024
    113
    Fort Wayne
    I guess I'm missing something, too. What exactly is preventing them from doing it now? There is quite a lack of details in the reporting around this issue. And that's where the proverbial devil seems to lie. I know there are states like Florida who are legislatively preventing their own state fund managers from prioritizing politics in investment decisions. Is the Labor Dept. rule attempting to block state law? I have no idea, and the media seems to have no interest in educating us.
    IANAL, but as was explained to me by my investment manager, if the investment manager/firm is a fiduciary to their clients, they have a legal responsibility to invest the clients' money in a way that would be most profitable for those clients. Investing in ESG for its own sake would be in violation of their fiduciary duty, and subject to penalties, beginning with restoring the clients' losses. If your investment manager is not a fiduciary, move to one who is!
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,265
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Someone help me understand the danger of allowing fund managers to pick what companies they invest in. From what I can tell this doesn't force the fund to prioritize ESG scores when evaluating a company, it only says that they can. How does this impact the average investor who can pick and choose which funds to put their money in? Doesn't this allow for more free market choice?

    Am I missing something?
    It breaches fiduciary duty. A fund manager's only concern should be what increases share holder equity. If an individual investor wants to only invest in green funds or some such, give them the tools they need to do so but don't drag all of a funds investors down that path

    ESG is the prime propaganda lever being used to prop up climate change nonsense in the financial investment space
     
    Top Bottom