Okay, IDPA bending over for Smith & Wesson for their 1911 with the slide cuts reminds me of a similar thing in USPSA.
Until few years ago, suppressors (sound) were treated the same was as compensators and muzzle brakes on rifles in USPSA 3-gun tournaments and Multi-gun. This was appropriate because in addition to reducing sound and muzzle flash, suppressors do a fantastic job of reducing felt recoil and muzzle rise. So, they were subject to the same rules as compensators/flash hiders in terms of maximum dimensions allowed in Limited and Tactical divisions. Then all of a sudden suppressors were no longer consider compensators or muzzles brakes. The weak, flimsy rationale given by the board was that since they don't have ports venting gases outward, they were not muzzle brakes or compensators. That's BS.
And here is the rest of the story ... it was at the same time Surefire was getting into the sport as a big sponsor. They of course make really nice suppressors that are smaller than most of the competition, but bigger than what was allowed in Limited and Tactical for a muzzle device. So after that convenient decision, those products could be used in those divisions thereafter. Coincidence? Maybe, but I don't think so.
That irritated me just as much then as this IDPA thing does now.
Until few years ago, suppressors (sound) were treated the same was as compensators and muzzle brakes on rifles in USPSA 3-gun tournaments and Multi-gun. This was appropriate because in addition to reducing sound and muzzle flash, suppressors do a fantastic job of reducing felt recoil and muzzle rise. So, they were subject to the same rules as compensators/flash hiders in terms of maximum dimensions allowed in Limited and Tactical divisions. Then all of a sudden suppressors were no longer consider compensators or muzzles brakes. The weak, flimsy rationale given by the board was that since they don't have ports venting gases outward, they were not muzzle brakes or compensators. That's BS.
And here is the rest of the story ... it was at the same time Surefire was getting into the sport as a big sponsor. They of course make really nice suppressors that are smaller than most of the competition, but bigger than what was allowed in Limited and Tactical for a muzzle device. So after that convenient decision, those products could be used in those divisions thereafter. Coincidence? Maybe, but I don't think so.
That irritated me just as much then as this IDPA thing does now.