I already have a proposal for state reciprocity: constitutional carry.
Seems to work pretty well for my other constitutionally-protected rights.
I think the 4th and 5th might not agree with you on that ;-)
I already have a proposal for state reciprocity: constitutional carry.
Seems to work pretty well for my other constitutionally-protected rights.
I continue my quest.
I thought I remember hearing your quest wound up getting you killed...in a odd and embarrassing manner.
But right before I die someone will show me SOMETHING that says no photo on the Larry prevents reciprocity, or at least this is what the Dali Lama told me, so I have THAT going for me.
Seems the only "official" responses to be the lack of required training (why Ohio doesn't accept ours) or the governor simply hasn't signed an agreement with the other state (West Virginia).
I thought there was a section that more explicitly states having the LTCH in one's possession is not required, but whether I missed it or it isn't there, this section essentially codifies the same result:
IC 35-47-2-24
Indictment or information; defendant's burden to prove exemption or license; arrest, effect of production of valid license, or establishment of exemption
Sec. 24. (a) In an information or indictment brought for the enforcement of any provision of this chapter, it is not necessary to negate any exemption specified under this chapter, or to allege the absence of a license required under this chapter. The burden of proof is on the defendant to prove that he is exempt under section 2 of this chapter, or that he has a license as required under this chapter.
(b) Whenever a person who has been arrested or charged with a violation of section 1 of this chapter presents a valid license to the prosecuting attorney or establishes that he is exempt under section 2 of this chapter, any prosecution for a violation of section 1 of this chapter shall be dismissed immediately, and all records of an arrest or proceedings following arrest shall be destroyed immediately.
As added by P.L.311-1983, SEC.32.
If memory serves, they simply removed the language that said you had to have the LTCH on you when asked about it. As we all know, if it doesn't say it's against the law, it's not against the law.
Well, I'm not 100% certain I'd be for that. But since it is no longer necessary for you to have the little pink permission slip in your possession I would say that there is no longer any reason for the State to issue a nicer, more durable card. I admit I've gone ahead and snapped a picture of mine with my smartphone so I have it handy if need be.
EDIT: Bah. Beat me.