Even and especially when they are on the stand giving sworn testimony thereto.Never trust a cop to know exactly what the law says.
So you wouldn't be covered if you were protecting a third party?Sec. 6-158. - Discharge of weapons prohibited.
No person shall cause to be discharged a weapon within the city limits of Wabash, Indiana, or permit a projectile resulting from said discharge of a weapon outside of the city limits of Wabash to enter into or pass over the city limits of Wabash, Indiana, except in the following cases:1. A duly authorized law enforcement officer in the discharge of his duty.
2. Where a person is protecting his person or his property.
3. Where a person discharges a weapon at a sanctioned target range, provided that a sanctioned target range shall be authorized by the police department; or
4. Where written permission is obtained from the police department for disposing of animals which are a nuisance or menace to the person or property of the people applying for said permission from the police department.
Hough was quicker.
You might also see what the local ordinances are for dogs being loose and that sort of thing. If you see those dogs loose again you might push for more than the warning the owner seems to have gotten away with.
Here's how the same scenario went down for an INGO member in Carmel:
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-defense/114140-bad-experience-carmel-pd.html
At this point I would contact the city attorney of Wabash, explain the situation, and let him/her know that the police department is giving the public an inaccurate interpretation of the law. IF the city attorney is serious about doing hs job he should send some sort of communication to the police department instructing them to give the PROPER interpretation of the law to citizens.