Indianapolis City County Council

[JettaKnight]

Here is his email address:

frank.mascari@indy.gov


Mr. Mascari:


Good luck with this proposal 112. The Indiana preemption law will render it meaningless even if you clowns do pass it.


Is it not bad enough that you waste taxpayer resources on matters such as the Red Line? Must you go further wasting taxpayer resources with grandstanding such as this?

Please don't send that for two reasons:

1. Calling someone a clown will lead to your message will be ignored; you'll only be showing how unprofessional you can be.
2. This has nothing to do with a ban in Indianapolis, ergo preemption has nothing to do with it; you'll only be showing your ignorance.



The proposal is nothing more than the equivalent of sitting on Santa's lap and asking for a new bike for Xmas.

 

[T.Lex]

Please don't send that for two reasons:

1. Calling someone a clown will lead to your message will be ignored; you'll only be showing how unprofessional you can be.
2. This has nothing to do with a ban in Indianapolis, ergo preemption has nothing to do with it; you'll only be showing your ignorance.



The proposal is nothing more than the equivalent of sitting on Santa's lap and asking for a new bike for Xmas.

Objection. If you ask Santa for a bike, you might actually get it.

 

[JettaKnight]

Objection. If you ask Santa for a bike, you might actually get it.

OK, OK... "...asking for a pony..."

 

[BigRed]

Please don't send that for two reasons:

1. Calling someone a clown will lead to your message will be ignored; you'll only be showing how unprofessional you can be.
2. This has nothing to do with a ban in Indianapolis, ergo preemption has nothing to do with it; you'll only be showing your ignorance.



The proposal is nothing more than the equivalent of sitting on Santa's lap and asking for a new bike for Xmas.

In reverse order:

2. You are correct. I did not read the document closely enough.

1. Having dealt with these jackasses for several years, I have given up on them actually listening to anything I have to say. Now it's pure entertainment.

 

[JettaKnight]

In reverse order:

2. You are correct. I did not read the document closely enough.

1. Having dealt with these jackasses for several years, I have given up on them actually listening to anything I have to say. Now it's pure entertainment.

Eh. As long as you know you're doing it for your own entertainment...

 

[openwell]

I sent my emails to oppose this nonsense.

Yep. I sent six emails using my NRA-ILA email program. From what I recall about 4 Gop. and 2 Dems. on the list for my address? Got 2 of 6 returned as spam? and suddenly got 2 mystery calls from unknown callers?

Not sure I am going to continue to send anymore to these non-sense political stunts by City gov't.

 

[BigRed]

Eh. As long as you know you're doing it for your own entertainment...

Yeah.

I like to email regarding the status of child molestation charges against councilman Jeff Miller amongst other matters.

That body is a friggin cesspool.

 

[BigRed]

https://www.wthr.com/article/molest...ounty-council-president-candidate-re-surfaces

 

[Haven]

The resolution died in committee tonight.

[video]http://www.wishtv.com/news/local-news/resolution-requesting-assault-weapons-ban-dies-in-city-council-committee/1237484241[/video]

 

[223 Gunner]

The resolution died in committee tonight.

[video]http://www.wishtv.com/news/local-news/resolution-requesting-assault-weapons-ban-dies-in-city-council-committee/1237484241[/video]

As we suspected it would. Like others have said, pandering to the base.

 

[searpinski]

I'm so displeased that this didn't pass. I've been sincerely concerned about encountering dangerous SPAS-12s (see attached) on the street.



(purple where applicable)

 

[DRob]

Standby for the real reason this was proposed. Just like several other proposals at the City and State levels put forth by Indy Dems, they know the proposal was stillborn. The just want to pound their collective chest and say they tried to save the children but the Republicans and the NRA don't care about them.

 

[MinuteManMike]

Just curious, for no reason...

Is Tarring And Feathering traitors illegal?

 

[TheRude1]

Constitution of the State of Indiana : Indiana Law

Article 1 section 32 should have shut this down from the get go.

And for the tarring and feathering traitors, Article 1 section 28 defines treason and I'm not sure if this would meet that definition ? But certainly could be argued !

 

[T.Lex]

Just curious, for no reason...

Is Tarring And Feathering traitors illegal?

Before or after conviction?

Before, it is illegal.

After, it is unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. Now.

 

[BigRed]

The Indianapolis city council is nothing more than a casting call for clowns.

 

[JettaKnight]

I'm so displeased that this didn't pass. I've been sincerely concerned about encountering dangerous SPAS-12s (see attached) on the street.



(purple where applicable)

IKR? Last time I saw one for sale the price was well north of $1000. And if you google "SPAS-12" that exact photo shows up.


And this is an example of horrible journalism! First, those are shotguns, not guns typically described as "assault weapons". Second, the resolution was not for a ban, but to urge lawmakers to enact a ban. Amirite?

 

[searpinski]

IKR? Last time I saw one for sale the price was well north of $1000. And if you google "SPAS-12" that exact photo shows up.


And this is an example of horrible journalism! First, those are shotguns, not guns typically described as "assault weapons". Second, the resolution was not for a ban, but to urge lawmakers to enact a ban. Amirite?

SPAS-12s are really more of a collector's item anymore. Garbage journalism--agree.

 

[MinuteManMike]

Before or after conviction?

Before, it is illegal.

After, it is unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. Now.

BUT we have jury nullification in our Indiana Constitution... now if a judge would ever LET you argue that in court...

 

[BigRed]

BUT we have jury nullification in our Indiana Constitution... now if a judge would ever LET you argue that in court...

One need not argue it in court...one only need argue it in the jury room....good jurors, and good citizens, are well aware of jury nullification; one of the last defenses against tyranny.