I do truly respect ATM's choice. He's come to a different conclusion than I have, but even with their shortcomings the NRA rules aren't the worst in the world. If ATM ever takes a break from patting himself on the back and accidentally actually teaches gun safety to someone then one more person will be a little bit safer. That is to the good.
On the other hand, I do not much respect how he has chosen to present himself. Do you?
Not in any way dependent on using NRA3 vs Cooper4 then.
That's an instruction style issue, not a ruleset issue. Either method ("look who broke a rule!" vs "let's look at the rules he broke and what better decisions he could have made") can be used with either set of rules. So no difference in "corrective application" then.
If you are really the most hardcore Cooper4 supporter who despises everything about the NRA3, and are false-flagging by supporting them as ineffectually and obnoxiously as possible then well played, sir. I confess I see it as going to an extreme just to sabotage the NRA3, but I cannot argue with the effectiveness.
Then you are failing. It is hard to believe that you are as yet unaware of that. Your chosen strategy does the exact opposite of this.
As a matter of fact, yes I do. Do you know him? Have you met him? Have you ever worked a firing line with him? He has trained hundreds (if not thousands) firearm safety, handling and marksmanship (not to mention American history and heritage and civic responsibility). He has done ALL of this without charging a penny because he loves this country and the Liberty we enjoy here, He has worked diligently to instill in others the love and appreciation for what our Founders did for generations to come while being absolutely apolitical in the process.