Is the group more important than the individual?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Is the group more important than the individual?


    • Total voters
      0

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,144
    149
    Columbus, OH
    The theorem doesn’t apply. In this case there are just two choices. Open it up or not.

    So what’s the rational choice here?

    I disagree. The theory postulates that even in that case you will not be able to achieve a consensus on which is better or worse. Because you noticed that people come to different conclusions based on the same data is why I posted it, it's a bit esoteric otherwise. If Mr Arrow is right, that disagreement, given the same inputs, is pretty much hard-wired. The work has been around since 1972 and I'm unaware of any meaningful dissent to the theory.
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    I disagree. The theory postulates that even in that case you will not be able to achieve a consensus on which is better or worse. Because you noticed that people come to different conclusions based on the same data is why I posted it, it's a bit esoteric otherwise. If Mr Arrow is right, that disagreement, given the same inputs, is pretty much hard-wired. The work has been around since 1972 and I'm unaware of any meaningful dissent to the theory.


    I dissent with the theory - just because the theory says somebody has to. :)
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,616
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I disagree. The theory postulates that even in that case you will not be able to achieve a consensus on which is better or worse. Because you noticed that people come to different conclusions based on the same data is why I posted it, it's a bit esoteric otherwise. If Mr Arrow is right, that disagreement, given the same inputs, is pretty much hard-wired. The work has been around since 1972 and I'm unaware of any meaningful dissent to the theory.
    It specifically states 3 or choices.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,616
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I dissent with the theory - just because the theory says somebody has to. :)
    I think there are some things it gets right and some things it gets wrong. Practically speaking group decisions, when the group has the same goal, can make rational decisions. I see that every day at work. But, when it comes to political decisions, where there are many different goals and motives, the theory tends to act true.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,616
    113
    Gtown-ish
    The irrational choice was made to shut down everything in order to show us who is boss.

    In November maybe they will learn the truth, but not likely.
    Is that really true? What makes you so certain that the only reason for this decision is to show everyone who is boss? Is Trump showing us who is boss?
     
    Top Bottom