Is the Whitehouse anti-Israel?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    - FOXNews.com
    - March 16, 2010
    Critics Accuse Administration of Exploiting Israel Dispute, Aiding 'Enemies'


    The Obama administration is drawing fierce criticism from both sides of the aisle for appearing to take dead aim at U.S. policy toward Israel by exploiting a dispute that began as a mere bureaucratic blunder.



    The Obama administration is drawing fierce criticism from both sides of the aisle for appearing to take dead aim at U.S. policy toward Israel by exploiting a dispute that began as a mere bureaucratic blunder.
    Critics suggest the turn against Israel is the latest in a series of diplomatic shifts that appear to give other Middle Eastern nations more weight -- while top U.S. officials were applying the squeeze to America's closest ally in the region, the administration was trying to lead the first U.S. ambassador to Syria in five years through confirmation.
    White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that the "unwavering commitment" to Israel is unchanged despite the escalating feud over a Jerusalem housing project.
    "Mature, bilateral relationships can have disagreements, and this is one of those disagreements," he said. "It does not break the unbreakable bond that we have with the Israeli government and the Israeli people on their security."
    But with Israel's ambassador calling this the worst crisis in 35 years, lawmakers and Israeli advocacy groups are accusing the administration of blowing the spat way out of proportion in order to extract concessions -- jeopardizing the vital relationship with Israel and aiding America's "enemies" in the process.
    "These matters need to be thought through before public pronouncements can significantly damage the U.S.-Israeli relationship and give aid and comfort to the enemies of the Mideast peace process," Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., said Tuesday on the Senate floor.
    The disagreement originally flared up after a mid-level Israeli official announced plans for 1,600 apartments in East Jerusalem while Vice President Biden was visiting. Biden, in response, issued a stern statement condemning the action. Israel apologized for the timing of the announcement, which had caught Biden off guard.
    That was last Tuesday.
    Since then, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton personally phoned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to scold him, White House senior adviser David Axelrod took to the Sunday shows to call Israel's actions an "affront" and an "insult," and most recently special envoy George Mitchell postponed his trip to the region.
    Sens. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and John McCain, R-Ariz. -- both big Israel supporters -- took to the Senate floor Monday to call on the Obama administration to give the dispute a rest.
    "It just doesn't serve anybody's interests but our enemies," Lieberman said.
    The American Israel Public Affairs Committee called the administration's statements a "matter of serious concern."
    Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., told Politico.com he believes the administration is trying to use the dispute to change U.S. policy toward Israel.
    The Washington Post reported that the Obama administration is using the disagreement to try to extract certain concessions from Netanyahu -- the U.S. reportedly wants Israel to not only stop the housing project but make a diplomatic gesture toward the Palestinians and declare all "core issues" on the table in any upcoming peace talks.
    But some warn the administration could be doing more harm than good. A column in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz Tuesday said that Obama could be giving Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas a window to make even more demands, arguing that Obama's call last June in Cairo for Israel to stop settlement activity similarly "left Abbas no choice but to demand the cessation of settlement activity."
    Netanyahu agreed to a 10-month freeze in the West Bank, but not East Jerusalem.
    "Now, after the statements made by Biden in Israel, followed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's public rebuke of Netanyahu, (Abbas) will demand the cessation of construction in Jerusalem," columnist Moshe Arens wrote.
    State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Tuesday that the United States is merely interested in trying to find the "right recipe" for Middle East peace.
    "We are pursuing our national interest," he said. "We're playing the role we've always played."
    He disputed the notion that the postponement of Mitchell's trip was a snub.
    "We are not sending a signal here," he said.

    :rolleyes::bs:

    I hope Israel tells Obama and the rest of his idiots to stay out of it affairs.
    Israel will only be weakened by the policies the Obama administration wants to put in place.
     

    Expat

    Pdub
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Feb 27, 2010
    109,888
    113
    Michiana
    President Obama has gone from one Muslim country to another, bowing to leaders, apologizing for the evil US, telling them what a Muslim nation the US is and not really Christian. He has thrown Israel under the bus every chance he has gotten since taking office.
     

    Doug

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    69   0   0
    Sep 5, 2008
    6,546
    149
    Indianapolis
    The Bohica Obama administration may not be specifically anti-Israel. It is, however, anti-American. Israel, being an ally of America, is attacked because it traditionally supports America. Bohica Obama wants to destroy America's reputation as a way to help destroy her economy. Once the economy is destroyed (the administration is now proclaiming 9.7% unemployment "normal" and saying this level of joblessness is expected to continue for several more years), he believes the people will turn to the government for help. Once enough people depend on the federal government for their very existence, the socialists will tax the productive people to support the non-workers who keep electing them.
    Either Bohica Obama is evil, as outlined above, or he's just stupid. Either way, he shouldn't be president.

    Doug
     

    irishfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    5,647
    38
    in your head
    Honestly I do not believe that the Obama administration is pro-Israel but more one world and one government types. Israel is the one country in the Middle East that is not in line with all of those around them and I do personally believe that they do not like having the different views so close together.
     

    E5RANGER375

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Feb 22, 2010
    11,507
    38
    BOATS n' HO's, Indy East
    good its about time a U.S. President isnt afraid to go up against israel. the so called "strategic aliance" based off of biblical principals. Israel needs their a** spanked for a long time now, im happy to see someone doing it.
     

    r3126

    Sharpshooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Dec 3, 2008
    709
    63
    Indy westside
    I think the real danger is in the perception by arab countries that there is some alienation between the US and Israel. Whether it is politically correct to say that Israel enjoys defacto protection from the US or not, the fact remains that our Government provides Israel with a majority of it's more advanced weapons systems. Additionally, the arab countries know that Israel exists under an umbrella of potential support by and from the US.

    When the arab countries decide that a significant enough rift exists between the US and Israel so that the US would not provide sufficient and timely enough support, they will decend on Israel like ants at a picnic. We, the US, cannot afford for Israel to fall - they are the only "friendly" nation in the entire geographical area.

    Should Israel be attacked and driven to the point of having to, they will use nuclear weapons for survival. What happens then? I shutter to think of what will follow in the way of WWIII or worse.

    We cannot abandon Israel if only for the critical geographical strength it gives us for our own national interest and for the unthinkable possibility of nuclear war.
     
    Last edited:

    irishfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    5,647
    38
    in your head
    good its about time a U.S. President isnt afraid to go up against israel. the so called "strategic aliance" based off of biblical principals. Israel needs their a** spanked for a long time now, im happy to see someone doing it.

    A lot of the countries around them have tried to "spank" them but it seems to always end up with Israel sending them home with their tales tucked and their land a little smaller. Israel in my opinion is a key alliance in a part of the world where we can trust absolutely no one.
     

    Glock17 Man

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 22, 2009
    63
    6
    N. Manchester
    YES the Whitehouse is anti-Israel

    Israel needs to stand up and "spank" every country that threatens them, but the U.S.A. should too. We have the same enemies.

    If a U.S. President tries to stop them from defending their people they need to tell him to get out of the way, sit down, and shutup. We would do it to them.
     

    E5RANGER375

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Feb 22, 2010
    11,507
    38
    BOATS n' HO's, Indy East
    A lot of the countries around them have tried to "spank" them but it seems to always end up with Israel sending them home with their tales tucked and their land a little smaller. Israel in my opinion is a key alliance in a part of the world where we can trust absolutely no one.


    yep i agree we dont wanna lose them all together as an ally, but sometimes since israel knows we got their back, they start talking too much and inciting the other countries to rise up even more, or they start getting out of bounce in my opinion. if i knew it wouldnt lead to world nuclear war, id love it if israel would nuke afew A-rab countries around them and clean up the world, but i know we can never have cake and eat it too. :D
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 29, 2009
    2,434
    36
    I'm not any more pro-Jew than I am pro-Mussie (and make no mistake, I'm certainly not that), but we've done nothing but bend over backwards to try to help Israel, and without us they long ago would have been a simmering crater in the ground... the day we try to help them sort out territorial disputes with their violent neighbors is the day they have to unveil more developments? You don't slap a friend in the face like that, especially a friend you need to supply you with nuclear missiles. I'm all for isolationist policy except in matters of trade, and even that I would like to see limited to Western Europe and Canada.
     

    BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    good its about time a U.S. President isnt afraid to go up against israel. the so called "strategic aliance" based off of biblical principals. Israel needs their a** spanked for a long time now, im happy to see someone doing it.

    I'm guessing you left the purple out on purpose?

    Exactly how are they going up against Israel in your view?

    Trying to tell a country that they can't build housing in their own country doesn't sound like "going up against". It just sounds plain @$! stupid.
     

    BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    I'm not any more pro-Jew than I am pro-Mussie (and make no mistake, I'm certainly not that), but we've done nothing but bend over backwards to try to help Israel, and without us they long ago would have been a simmering crater in the ground... the day we try to help them sort out territorial disputes with their violent neighbors is the day they have to unveil more developments? You don't slap a friend in the face like that, especially a friend you need to supply you with nuclear missiles. I'm all for isolationist policy except in matters of trade, and even that I would like to see limited to Western Europe and Canada.

    The way we have tried to help Israel is by making them concede. We are not making the Palestinians concede anything. Israel gets weaker each time she tries to make peace with her neighbors.

    Land for peace is a farce. Why Israel listens to us is beyond me. Each time Israel has given up land there has been no peace. They have just made it easier for more of their populace to be reached by the Palestinian rockets.
    I for one would not be making deals or giving up property\land to an enemy whose charter calls for my destruction. That is beyond insane.

    With each land for peace deal, Israel becomes smaller and weaker. How many deals does she have to make before she becomes non-existent?
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 29, 2009
    2,434
    36
    The way we have tried to help Israel is by making them concede. We are not making the Palestinians concede anything. Israel gets weaker each time she tries to make peace with her neighbors.

    Land for peace is a farce. Why Israel listens to us is beyond me. Each time Israel has given up land there has been no peace. They have just made it easier for more of their populace to be reached by the Palestinian rockets.
    I for one would not be making deals or giving up propertyland to an enemy whose charter calls for my destruction. That is beyond insane.

    With each land for peace deal, Israel becomes smaller and weaker. How many deals does she have to make before she becomes non-existent?

    I'm not asking for concessions of land - I'm asking that if someone wants my help, they need to at least pretend that they give two damns about negotiations for appearances. Let's sit down at the table and you can quietly build however many settlements you want - but what you don't do is undercut the presence of someone sent in to try to help you. Hell, burn down what's left of Palestine, fine - but don't do it in a way that makes me or my country look stupid for trying to help. That's what you don't do... a minimum standard which apparently Israel doesn't understand or abide.
     
    Top Bottom