Hatin Since 87
Bacon Hater
Social media companies do not have first amendment right to ban protected speech, section 230 unconstitutional
So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?I always believed the BOR was for "The People" not big business
Well Thomas must be going senile. I’d be damned if govt told me what I had to allow in my private business.
Strawman...So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?
So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?
I hate this argument because there is a line between the services a business provides all customers, like offering a cake that is available for all customers, vs. creating custom art in violation of ones convictions...So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?
Of course he's going to say they "should" be allowed to, because there's no danger of it actually happening. The left-most position already won.So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?
I've always enjoyed itI dunno fellers, this whole being the underdog thing might just be fun for awhile.
Who said anything about Democrats? Are you trying to steer the conversation elsewhere?I thought democrats valued individual's rights over corporate power?
I guess that depends on which way the wind is blowing on a given day, or rather, who is in office.
Yeah, kinda notStrawman...
Absolutely.So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?
Now this is where the debate is. In this there is a fine line.And if your electric company drops you because of your posts?
I said this back when the case was ongoing. I’ve always been in favor of allowing hateful people to discriminate, with only a few exceptions; typically related to health and survival of the person being discriminated against.Of course he's going to say they "should" be allowed to, because there's no danger of it actually happening. The left-most position already won.
So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?
But I only have the best posts.....And if your electric company drops you because of your posts?