Kahr PM9/CM9 or Ruger LC9

[mbaza3]

I am looking at single stack 9mm pistols for IWB carry. I know the Kahr PM9/CM9 is a bit longer than the Ruger LC9. Having said that, the Ruger is thinner than the LC9 but it weighs about 2 ounces more. I was wondering what suggestions anyone might have from research or experience as to which one I should buy.

 

[spec4]

Me too, looking for the same thing. To complicate matters, the Kimber Solo needs to be checkd out along with a SIG p290. I was leaning towards a PM9 just based on research (never held one), but struggling over the price. Eager to hear what others say.

 

[S8MS-01904]

I'm in favor of the LC9 after having good luck with the LCP.

 

[mbaza3]

A big negative I see with the Kahr is you are not supposed to rack the slide and instead use the slide release. This seems a bit awkward.

 

[combat45acp]

Kahr makes one heck of a pistol, if I were choosing between the two it would be the Kahr. Both are small for iwb, at least to me anyway because I carry a 1911. I would have a hard time with the Ruger, the solo carry Kimber is crazy ugly to me so that would be out too. Don't get me started on these newer Sig's either, they are not even close to the old ones in quality.

 

[Squib]

Actually, if you compare the specs, I believe you will find the Kahr is a half inch shorter than the Ruger. It is also a few ounces lighter while the widths are the same. Of course the PM/CM specs are identical.

 

[mbaza3]

I held the solo and is felt really nice. The price is a bit much.

 

[Bartman]

FWIW, you might want to consider the CW9 if you're looking for strictly IWB and no pocket carry. They're the same width. The CW is only a half inch taller and I was able to get all 4 fingers on the grip rather than having my pinky dangling. My

 

[indykid]

With the CM9 being significantly cheaper than the PM9 it give it a great advantage. I have carried the PM9 virtually since it has been available, and have not had any issues with it other than forgetting it is in my pocket when I go into a criminal protection zone.

Carried in a Desantis Nemisis pocket holster it is my almost constant companion.

 

[sartwell]

I have a CW45 and a LC9. I carry the Kahr most of time, just feels better to me. I would go with the Kahr if it was me.

 

[Dogman]

Kahr PM9 without a doubt.

 

[Nsw550]

I love my LCP

 

[LLDJR]

I carry a PM9 daily and the PM40 is the same size as the PM9, I have carried the PM40 before as well, a smidgen heavier than the PM9

and a LCP on occasion for business dress***, if you like a safety then the LC9 might be good, but I could not find a smaller 9mm than a PM9,, the Keltec PF9, is similar is size but still slightly larger than the PM9 and not near the quality of a PM9, but the KelTec is half the cost

PM9 for sure, you can shoot mine if you are ever at MCFG

 

[rugertoter]

I'm in favor of the LC9 after having good luck with the LCP.

Yes, I own and agree with the LCP, but don't forget they did have a recall on the first ones that came out. I love the look of the LC9, but would want to see how it performs out on the streets for awhile before I bought one. Its probably less pricey than the Kahrs, which are fine pistols in their own right, but I don't believe any better in quality than the Rugers. JMHO.

 

[Sticky]

I like the LC9 better. The Kahr is good too. I prefer the ergonomics of the Ruger. Try both if possible.

EDIT: Found this video by hickok45 on them: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Av9COfLB_Y&NR=1

 

[spencer rifle]

You still might consider a PF9 - thinner than the CM9 and less expensive. The trigger may have a long pull, but mine is smooth and not hard. Still, everything I've read gives Kahr the highest marks for trigger. If I could justify the extra cost I'd have a CM9. But I still like my PF9.

 

[Willie]

https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/handguns/142316-new_kahr_cm9_vs_ruger_lc9_pics.html

 

[GARANDGUY]

Me too, looking for the same thing. To complicate matters, the Kimber Solo needs to be checkd out along with a SIG p290. I was leaning towards a PM9 just based on research (never held one), but struggling over the price. Eager to hear what others say.

If your looking at the P290 you might as well get the 250 instead so that you can have a more versitile platform that you can change caliber and size at will. If you want a subcompact 9,357,or 40 to CC one day or a full size 9mm the next you can do it alot cheaper than buying seperate guns!
I like my LC9 but have only had it about a week so the jury is still out on it.The ergo on it is great and it points very nice! Accuracy is good too.

 

[booey50]

get the kahr...

at least they didn't directly copy off of Keltec...


Keltec Pf9 the original LC9

However, the LC9 vs the PF-9...

LC9 is longer (6.00" vs 5.85"), taller (4.5" vs 4.3"), wider (0.90" vs 0.88"), and worst of all, heavier (17.1oz vs 12.7oz). 40% heavier!
Plus the Ruger has a manual safety on it....

 

[mrclean]

get the kahr...

at least they didn't directly copy off of Keltec...


Keltec Pf9 the original LC9

However, the LC9 vs the PF-9...

LC9 is longer (6.00" vs 5.85"), taller (4.5" vs 4.3"), wider (0.90" vs 0.88"), and worst of all, heavier (17.1oz vs 12.7oz). 40% heavier!
Plus the Ruger has a manual safety on it....

It may be a copy but its better made copy. Also what about all the 1911 copies out there? I love my lc9. Slide is very tight and I like the extra weight over the keltec. Less recoil.