LCP

[Cemetery-man]

I have had two of them in the past, and they did "ok", but I was not as handy as I should have been with them due to my hands being too large. I eventually traded them off on a slightly bigger 9mm gun, that I could still wear in a pocket with summer clothes on.

 

[Midskier]

LCP is just fine nice small size smoothed edges
safe long trigger pull - I have no issue with
several hundred rounds with -0- issues
hogue grip helps @ the range - it's NOT a range gun
better choice in same size is kahr cw380 stainless slide
almost identical in size - shoots like it's much bigger
but has VERY stiff recoil spring ( easy mod to LCP, will reduce felt recoil, increase effort to rack)
and the kahr is ammo sensitive

 

[crispy]

Simply put, the TCP is better.

And I'm a Ruger fan.

 

[ru44mag]

I liked mine. Sold it though. Sig P238 is way better. Save your money. It's worth it.

 

[Rooster_Cogburn87]

I like the concealability. I have big hands so it does make the grip a bit awkward. I just bought a Glock 42 which fits better in my hands and makes the LCP feel a little chinsy and is just as concealable. Also one of my LCP magazines randomly fell apart as I ejected it from the gun. Don't know if this is a common occurrence or if I was just the lucky winner but thats not really a chance I like to bet my life on.

 

[RetDep310]

Overall, a good gun that serves it's purpose. It's a deep conceal pistol that is better than having a sharp stick. But, in my opinion, absolutely a pain to shoot. Qualified with it several times as one of my LEOSA carry guns. I must say that I put over 400 rounds through it with absolutely no malfunctions, and it was one of the earlier produced runs. Still won't get rid of it.

 

[halfmileharry]

I bought the LCP 'cause I had the Keltec P3AT and wanted to compare. I kept the P3AT and sold the LCP.
The LCP was an ok gun and no major complaints at all.