I've seen you mention this several times before. Did you ever try and diagnose the issue with the 509, or just gave up both times and sold/traded them off?2 of 2 509s that I've owned had fail to feed problems after 2k rds. My 2.0 has been flawless. I'd go 2.0 all day.
I have both and love both. The M&P will cost less to buy, have better aftermarket support, less expensive mags and more holsters to choose from. That being said, I like the factory trigger in the 509 more and I was able find a holster I like for it from a major brand, it also uses Sig P226 sights so there is that. I spent $160 and put an Apex trigger kit in my M&P because I still didn't care for the factory trigger compared to other guns I like. The M&P is a softer shooter in regards to felt recoil. Not that the 509 is unbearable, but it is noticeably snappier and was not only noticed by myself but a friend as well without me mentioning it before he shot it.Help me choose. Please only comment from experience. Pretty much narrowed down between the 2.0 and 509.
I've seen you mention this several times before. Did you ever try and diagnose the issue with the 509, or just gave up both times and sold/traded them off?
I can't speak for the 509, but I have a 2.0 that I like. I'm also digging the CZ p10c. ....