Many of You Should Have Your LTCH Revoked for Life

[Route 45]

LOL...What??? Please don't tell me you think the guy is hot...

She is a 4 or 5 at best. Given the fact that you think that she is hot, it would explain why you love Glocks, which are also fairly ugly pistols.

I can draw a chart to explain my comment further, if you'd like.

 

[G19X]

She is a 4 or 5 at best. Given the fact that you think that she is hot, it would explain why you love Glocks, which are also fairly ugly pistols.

I can draw a chart to explain my comment further, if you'd like.

She is not a knockout, I admit. But I sense she is a sweet person on the inside (I could be wrong). That is what means the most. If you don’t understand that I feel sorry for you.

 

[Snapdragon]

She is not a knockout, I admit. But I sense she is a sweet person on the inside (I could be wrong). That is what means the most. If you don’t understand that I feel sorry for you.

Sure, because that's exactly the same thing as "That girl is HOT!! ".

 

[G19X]

Sure, because that's exactly the same thing as "That girl is HOT!! ".

Hot on the inside. Rating women with a number is sexist and immature.

 

[littletommy]

I almost posted in this thread but decided not to.

 

[G19X]

Back to the issue ----> Everyone who has ever had an N/D should have their LTCH revoked for life. A A/D (mechanical failure) no…but an N/D…yes. That is nothing but ridiculous and could have killed or injured someone. People like that give responsible gun owner a bad reputation. It gives the anti-2A people ammo.

 

[actaeon277]

Massad Ayoob just had an accidental discharge. Are we advocating taking his license away?

 

[G19X]

Massad Ayoob just had an accidental discharge. Are we advocating taking his license away?

If you mean A/D as in mechanical failure then no...if negligent, the Yes.

Funny I just read his book "Deadly Force Understanding Your Right To Self Defense" last week.

 

[ATM]

Nobody deserves an LTCH, its necessity is an infringement.

What should be revoked is the Indiana prohibition on handgun carry.

 

[actaeon277]

Yes

Really?
And what are your qualifications to make that judgment?
Pretty sure they're less than his qualifications.

 

[G19X]

Really?
And what are your qualifications to make that judgment?
Pretty sure they're less than his qualifications.

My qualification is I never had an N/D. So I didn't endanger the public. He can still train people...just have him use a toy gun.

 

[actaeon277]

My qualification is I never had an N/D. So I didn't endanger the public.

There are hundreds of thousands that would argue that just carrying a gun, you are endangering the public.
So, by that standard, I guess you are giving up your LTCH?

 

[Spear Dane]

 

[G19X]

There are hundreds of thousands that would argue that just carrying a gun, you are endangering the public.
So, by that standard, I guess you are giving up your LTCH?

People who argue that are anti gun folks.

 

[actaeon277]

People who argue that are anti gun folks.

So. What's your point?
The argument was made "endanger the public".
You have made a decision as to what constitutes "endanger the public".
So have they.

So, by YOUR OWN REASONING, you should give up guns.

 

[MontereyC6]

Everyone who has ever had an N/D should have their LTCH revoked for life. A A/D (mechanical failure) no…but an N/D…yes.

I feel the same way about people's ability to post on here. I wish there was something I could do about it. Oh wait......

 

[G19X]

So. What's your point?
The argument was made "endanger the public".
You have made a decision as to what constitutes "endanger the public".
So have they.

So, by YOUR OWN REASONING, you should give up guns.

Your logic is not on caliber with Mr. Spock.

My View:
Everyone who has ever had an N/D should have their LTCH revoked for life. A A/D (mechanical failure) no…but an N/D…yes. That is nothing but ridiculous and could have killed or injured someone. People like that give responsible gun owner a bad reputation. It gives the anti-2A people ammo.

Whoever don't like it...tough cookies. I'm not going to argue this point over and over. The END.

 

[G19X]

I feel the same way about people's ability to post on here. I wish there was something I could do about it. Oh wait......

So, you are going to lock the thread because you don't like my view?

 

[Snapdragon]

I'm not going to argue this point over and over. The END.

I'm guessing you will and it's not.

 

[actaeon277]

My qualification is I never had an N/D. So I didn't endanger the public. He can still train people...just have him use a toy gun.

Your logic.
So I didn't endanger the public.

The same as an anti-gunner.
I'm glad YOU pointed that out.
I wouldn't want to accuse an INGOer of sounding like an anti-gunner.