1911 is not even a 1 bad guy gun sometimes.1911 is a 2 bad guy gun, problem starts when you live or visit a 3 bad guy town.
It is the carpenter, not the hammer. By all means if your skill set dictates then carry a pallet full.1911 is not even a 1 bad guy gun sometimes.
Why one cop carries 145 rounds of ammo on the job
Before the call that changed Sergeant Timothy Gramins’ life forever, he typically carried 47 rounds of handgun ammunition on his person while on dutywww.police1.com
I have no issues or concerns over relying on a 1911 in all applications. Not to say that I do not carry two extra magazines, for added capacity and malfunction insurance.1911 is not even a 1 bad guy gun sometimes.
Why one cop carries 145 rounds of ammo on the job
Before the call that changed Sergeant Timothy Gramins’ life forever, he typically carried 47 rounds of handgun ammunition on his person while on dutywww.police1.com
Back about 45 years ago the police in a CA city were transitioning from revolvers to S&W model 59s. The armorer told me it just made his job harder because when there was a shooting he was the guy who had to account for all the bullets that didn't connect. He said that with revolvers it typically meant the cops would connect with the first two shots and miss the next four. With the Smith autos they would connect with the first two shots and miss the next thirteen. Capacity tends to the "spray and pray" mindset. Higher capacity mandates more training, not less.
Threat assessment and training is not the opposite of equipment selection. To me, the combination of best practices with modern equipment is the way to maximize the chances of prevailing in a lethal force encounter.Im my opinion John a Public would be far better served by doing a threat assessment and training to counter the most likely threats versus worrying about having the end all be all mega blaster.
It should be one package, to date I have not Read how anyone ever stated that they wished they did not have that 1911 when things went south.Threat assessment and training is not the opposite of equipment selection. To me, the combination of best practices with modern equipment is the way to maximize the chances of prevailing in a lethal force encounter.
No one in the middle of a deadly situation ever wished for less ammo. Which is why there is a Hellcat Pro in my pocket right now as I’m out and about, instead of some 5 shot good luck charm that would have been right at home in a vest pocket in the 1800’s.
It's eye opening when you train to engage 2 or 3 targets with a single stack or revolver. There's a lot of reloading involved.
However, something to keep in mind as well: each additional attacker increases the difficulty of the gunfight significantly.
Even with a fun-size stendo, you're unlikely to prevail against 3+ determined armed assailants.
Sorry, I can see how my point might be lost...Try it with three role players with Simunitions. There probably won't be any reloading.
Police departments constantly post those spread pictures showing all the guns they pulled off arrestees that week or month or whatever. It's a good cross section of criminal equipment, and what do you see?
Some pocket holdout guns, a LOT of Glocks, and AR/AK pistols. Criminal weapon choice is a blend of availability and mission. Availability is, just talking facts here, a fun house mirror reflection of the regular civilian market because thats where the guns come from.
So yeah, their mission demands capacity, and in the modern market that capability is available. The notorious stendo is the criminal version of putting the M249 on the truck for ambush response. Now with AR/AK pistols they have extremely high capacity along with some degree of rifle caliber effectiveness, and can be concealed in vehicles or bags.
That doesn't mean you need to roll with a whole Batman belt, but it is indisputable that a degree of firepower that would have made national news in the 70s is pretty common now. Prepare accordingly and don't assume the threat will be a crackhead with a duct taped Charter Arms.