Miranda Rights SCOTUS

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    Famous Miranda rights warning could get rewrite


    I'm all for Miranda rights but Aleito is really strectching it here. He wants to add that you can choose to be silent again if you decuded to talk an nd then change your mind.
    Really ? Are we all that stupid? :dunno:

    Good grief
    Sounds familar.

    "It depends on what the definition
    of the word 'is' is" -Bill Clinton
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 29, 2009
    2,434
    36
    Famous Miranda rights warning could get rewrite


    I'm all for Miranda rights but Aleito is really strectching it here. He wants to add that you can choose to be silent again if you decuded to talk an nd then change your mind.
    Really ? Are we all that stupid? :dunno:

    Whoa, whoa, whoa...

    if he wants to "give" us more rights, hey, let's not stop the man.

    Also, Supreme Court is abbrev. S.Ct.

    Nothing against you, just VERY tired of seeing it as 'SCOTUS'... especially as the words 'of' and 'the' wouldn't be capitalized, as are the words 'United States' also implied. Just a tip.

    Still interesting, though.

    And to answer your rhetorical question... well, the type of person who might be put into that situation may not be the most intelligent of the bunch to begin with: if you're committing crime (or accused of committing crime) and getting caught, you've screwed up no fewer than twice. If you talk to the police, no fewer than three times. I'd rather have too much protection from government than too little - if, in fact, 'too much' protection could EVER be had against gov't.

    Thanks for the heads-up. I found this interesting to say the least, good sir.

    :patriot:
     

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    Supreme Court junkies would tell you that it's very hard to tell how the Justices will vote by listening to oral argument.
     
    Top Bottom