More Obamacare Tyranny Coming to a Home Near You

[Liberty1911]

Mold? Leaky Roof? Obama Administration Says All Americans Must Have 'Healthy Housing' | CNS News

 

[schmeed]

Nanny state. No one can be responsible for themselves...

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

I wonder what theis administration plans to do about houses, aptartments etc etc that have been used to make meth.

 

[steveh_131]

This is good news!

Can you imagine the tax dollars wasted treating people who get sick from these sorts of living conditions?

Until the safety net is removed, we must accept this sort of tyranny in our lives.

First, remove the safety net. Then allow people the freedom to determine the safety of their housing. Right?

 

[Liberty1911]

LOL. I've clearly gotten under the skin of the local Libertarians by exposing their hypocrisy on using the government to impose their morals on society.

 

[steveh_131]

The logic is undeniable.

 

[LEaSH]

I read somewhere that England is proposing a "Bedroom Tax". I'll find a link.

It's just the sort of thing Pelosi was talking about...

http://www.housing.org.uk/policy/welfare_reform/bedroom_tax.aspx

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-21358748

This is symptomatic of what our future will look like.

 

[Liberty1911]

The logic is undeniable.

Logic isn't your forte.

And yes, that's a snarky comment.

 

[indykid]

Just wait until they find out how much dangerous lead some people have laying around the house! I know many on this site that have "several" pounds of the deadly stuff laying around.

 

[steveh_131]

Logic isn't your forte.

And yes, that's a snarky comment.

Good luck refuting it.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

It's a good thing the federal government already owns the vast majority of mortgages out there. That leverage ought to go a long way in helping them in these 5 new goals.

It doesn't take much of an imagination to realize when they say "Establish healthy homes recommendations (homes should be dry, clean, pest-free, safe, contaminant-free, well-ventilated, and well-maintained and thermally controlled)" it means new regulations galore are already written and ready to be released that will only marginally improve conditions for the vast majority of home owners while making much, much more expensive to build new homes--with a side benefit of more dependence on the government to help finance new homes;

Or when they say "Encourage adoption of healthy homes recommendations (federal, state and local regulations)" they mean widespread adoption of Agenda 21;

Or when they say "Create and support training and workforce development to address health hazards in housing (train people for new jobs in green energy and construction)"; means a payoff to the various construction unions and a little love for their campaign contributors...who knows, maybe they'll finally get wood burning stoves outlawed.

 

[Liberty1911]

Good luck refuting it.

It's pretty sad to see you stoop to trolling other people's threads.

You should give it a rest. It's just the internet, it's not really serious business.

I sincerely hope you enjoy your weekend. And no, that's not a snarky comment.

 

[steveh_131]

It's pretty sad to see you stoop to trolling other people's threads.

You should give it a rest. It's just the internet, it's not really serious business.

I sincerely hope you enjoy your weekend. And no, that's not a snarky comment.

Internet lesson for the aged: 'Trolling' and 'serious business' are mutually exclusive.

Also, I'm waiting for an explanation of why we shouldn't control peoples' living conditions as long as we're forced to pay for this medical safety net for them.

 

[schmeed]

It's a good thing the federal government already owns the vast majority of mortgages out there. That leverage ought to go a long way in helping them in these 5 new goals.

It doesn't take much of an imagination to realize when they say "Establish healthy homes recommendations (homes should be dry, clean, pest-free, safe, contaminant-free, well-ventilated, and well-maintained and thermally controlled)" it means new regulations galore are already written and ready to be released that will only marginally improve conditions for the vast majority of home owners while making much, much more expensive to build new homes--with a side benefit of more dependence on the government to help finance new homes;

Or when they say "Encourage adoption of healthy homes recommendations (federal, state and local regulations)" they mean widespread adoption of Agenda 21;

Or when they say "Create and support training and workforce development to address health hazards in housing (train people for new jobs in green energy and construction)"; means a payoff to the various construction unions and a little love for their campaign contributors...who knows, maybe they'll finally get wood burning stoves outlawed.

Spot on!!!!!!

 

[Liberty1911]

It's a good thing the federal government already owns the vast majority of mortgages out there. That leverage ought to go a long way in helping them in these 5 new goals.

It doesn't take much of an imagination to realize when they say "Establish healthy homes recommendations (homes should be dry, clean, pest-free, safe, contaminant-free, well-ventilated, and well-maintained and thermally controlled)" it means new regulations galore are already written and ready to be released that will only marginally improve conditions for the vast majority of home owners while making much, much more expensive to build new homes--with a side benefit of more dependence on the government to help finance new homes;

Or when they say "Encourage adoption of healthy homes recommendations (federal, state and local regulations)" they mean widespread adoption of Agenda 21;

Or when they say "Create and support training and workforce development to address health hazards in housing (train people for new jobs in green energy and construction)"; means a payoff to the various construction unions and a little love for their campaign contributors...who knows, maybe they'll finally get wood burning stoves outlawed.

Good point about the gov owning the mortgages.

I also see a new round of redistribution coming. Of course, not everyone will be able to afford these mandates, assuming they become mandates, and will need "assistance".

 

[steveh_131]

It's a good thing the federal government already owns the vast majority of mortgages out there. That leverage ought to go a long way in helping them in these 5 new goals.

It doesn't take much of an imagination to realize when they say "Establish healthy homes recommendations (homes should be dry, clean, pest-free, safe, contaminant-free, well-ventilated, and well-maintained and thermally controlled)" it means new regulations galore are already written and ready to be released that will only marginally improve conditions for the vast majority of home owners while making much, much more expensive to build new homes--with a side benefit of more dependence on the government to help finance new homes;

Or when they say "Encourage adoption of healthy homes recommendations (federal, state and local regulations)" they mean widespread adoption of Agenda 21;

Or when they say "Create and support training and workforce development to address health hazards in housing (train people for new jobs in green energy and construction)"; means a payoff to the various construction unions and a little love for their campaign contributors...who knows, maybe they'll finally get wood burning stoves outlawed.

Well...this is quite brilliant. I think you nailed it.

 

[rambone]

Logic isn't your forte.

And yes, that's a snarky comment.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGstM8QMCjQ[/ame]

 

[rcjohnson64]

look at Pelosi, bedroom tax is the only action she'll ever see!!!

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Well...this is quite brilliant. I think you nailed it.

 

[88GT]

I don't care anymore.

Even the "conservatives" seem to make room for this kind of tyranny when it's something they want. I've ceased being surprised about it. Why not stop being upset by it?


Oh, dear God. Did I just set myself apart from the conservatives? Am I really that much closer to being a libertarian? No, no, I won't do it. I won't join the dark side.