I voted no even though I believe an applicant should be able to display some proficiency and understand basic firearms safety. But as it has been posted repeatedly, you know damn well that system would be abused to no end. I could just imagine the requirements 20 years from now: 29 of 30 shots in the 10 ring at 50 yards, 98% score on your 200 question exam & 20/20 vision. Oh and don't forget your mandatory LTCH insurance policy that no company will underwrite, so no one can get a licence anyway.
I lost my nephew to a ND and that was a tragedy that could have been avoided had his friend just followed basic firearms safety. I drill firearms safety to my kids even with toy guns & remind them of their cousins fate. Would mandatory training have saved his life? Only God knows. Maybe the state can funnel some tax dollars for a free basic pistol course for all new licences to incentivize training instead of making it mandatory.
I lost my nephew to a ND and that was a tragedy that could have been avoided had his friend just followed basic firearms safety. I drill firearms safety to my kids even with toy guns & remind them of their cousins fate. Would mandatory training have saved his life? Only God knows. Maybe the state can funnel some tax dollars for a free basic pistol course for all new licences to incentivize training instead of making it mandatory.