Never believe we aren't going to take your guns

[Bunnykid68]

Am I the only one who thinks this post is full of fail?!? Despite what the title says, NO ONE is loosing their guns. They just can't get them fixed, give them away or sell shotguns with more than 7 rounds. So i't's NOT every shotgun, like the post implies. AND it's a hunting rifle, not a self-defense gun. How many times have i heard that the 2A is NOT about hunting???

There is a TON of horrendous legislation being proposed that infringes upon our 2A rights. Let's worry about the REAL threats!

How is this bill any less threatening? If it passes as is you couldn't even hand those shotguns to your son or daughter.

 

[Scutter01]

Am I the only one who thinks this post is full of fail?!? Despite what the title says, NO ONE is loosing their guns. They just can't get them fixed, give them away or sell shotguns with more than 7 rounds. So i't's NOT every shotgun, like the post implies. AND it's a hunting rifle, not a self-defense gun. How many times have i heard that the 2A is NOT about hunting???

There is a TON of horrendous legislation being proposed that infringes upon our 2A rights. Let's worry about the REAL threats!

I find your postbit user title ironic in light of posts like this.

 

[mbills2223]

I'm so ready for this crap to be over. For so many reasons...the new wave of INGO trolls leaving not being the least among them (no reference to anyone in particular). Market price coming back down to "the good ol' days" of 6 months ago won't be all that bad either.

 

[reesez]

I'm so ready for this crap to be over. For so many reasons...the new wave of INGO trolls leaving not being the least among them (no reference to anyone in particular). Market price coming back down to "the good ol' days" of 6 months ago won't be all that bad either.

Amen.

 

[LANShark42]

I find your postbit user title ironic in light of posts like this.

Did you bother to read the article? No guns are being taken. None. i'm not talking about acceptable losses. I understand there are none. All I'm saying is we need to get our facts straight or we are no better than them.

 

[Frankingun]

How is this bill any less threatening? If it passes as is you couldn't even hand those shotguns to your son or daughter.

And if one were to pick up a [STRIKE]high[/STRIKE] standard capacity magazine at a range that the guy next to you dropped, you're both in trouble.

And for the last time, if you have a gun and want to keep it, never, ever vote democrat.

 

[Scutter01]

Did you bother to read the article? No guns are being taken. None. i'm not talking about acceptable losses. I understand there are none. All I'm saying is we need to get our facts straight or we are no better than them.

Someone who claims "molan labe" in their postbit should understand that we cannot afford to pick and choose which anti-gun legislation to oppose. Whe should oppose ALL of it. This latest bill is as much an infringement as the one that says "turn in all your guns or else". The bill will have the same effect as the Hughes Amendment in that it will permanently fix the supply of shotguns in Colorado. In 20 years, there will be no legal shotguns there whatsoever. Please explain how that is somehow not "taking (their) guns"?

And yes, I read the article. I also read the bill and it is an infringement.

 

[atvdave]

Elections have consequences.

So Right!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Arm America]

Pathetic !!

 

[LANShark42]

Someone who claims "molan labe" in their postbit should understand that we cannot afford to pick and choose which anti-gun legislation to oppose. Whe should oppose ALL of it. This latest bill is as much an infringement as the one that says "turn in all your guns or else". The bill will have the same effect as the Hughes Amendment in that it will permanently fix the supply of shotguns in Colorado. In 20 years, there will be no legal shotguns there whatsoever. Please explain how that is somehow not "taking (their) guns"?

And yes, I read the article. I also read the bill and it is an infringement.

So every shotgun in Colorado holds more than 8 rounds?!? If so, I guess the sky really is falling.

Do I equate an over 8 round mag ban with "taking guns"? No. Is either acceptable? Again, no.

 

[Scutter01]

So every shotgun in Colorado holds more than 8 rounds?!? .

According to both the article, the recently passed magazine ban and this new proposed legislation, yes. If it can be "readily converted" through the addition of a "magazine extension", then it becomes a prohibited firearm, whether it actually has an extension installed or not.

Again, my question is not about this specific bill, but why you seem to be trying to steer people's attention away from it and onto "REAL threats!". I consider ALL anti-gun legislation to be a real threat and I have plenty of focus to write letters regarding all of it.

 

[mbills2223]

According to both the article, the recently passed magazine ban and this new proposed legislation, yes. If it can be "readily converted" through the addition of a "magazine extension", then it becomes a prohibited firearm, whether it actually has an extension installed or not.

Again, my question is not about this specific bill, but why you seem to be trying to steer people's attention away from it and onto "REAL threats!". I consider ALL anti-gun legislation to be a real threat and I have plenty of focus to write letters regarding all of it.

Not one more single inch.

 

[9mmfan]

So every shotgun in Colorado holds more than 8 rounds?!? If so, I guess the sky really is falling.

Do I equate an over 8 round mag ban with "taking guns"? No. Is either acceptable? Again, no.

No, now it doesn't include those under 8 rounds NOW, but as a lot of INGO members have espoused, those current Colorado legislatures have several more years in power to reak havoc on their citizens rights to own guns.

 

[LANShark42]

According to both the article, the recently passed magazine ban and this new proposed legislation, yes. If it can be "readily converted" through the addition of a "magazine extension", then it becomes a prohibited firearm, whether it actually has an extension installed or not.

Again, my question is not about this specific bill, but why you seem to be trying to steer people's attention away from it and onto "REAL threats!". I consider ALL anti-gun legislation to be a real threat and I have plenty of focus to write letters regarding all of it.

I'm not trying to steer anyone's attention anywhere. I simply asked if anyone else felt the OP's title and post was misleading. Apparently you do not. No doubt there are others that don't feel that way as well. I knew my post would likely be unpopular. You are entitled to your beliefs. As am I.

 

[Scutter01]

I'm not trying to steer anyone's attention anywhere. I simply asked if anyone else felt the OP's title and post was misleading.

Then I apologize. I apparently completely misunderstood your comment:

There is a TON of horrendous legislation being proposed that infringes upon our 2A rights. Let's worry about the REAL threats!

 

[LANShark42]

Then I apologize. I apparently completely misunderstood your comment:

No apology necessary. I truly believe we are on the same side here.

 

[Small's]

If that passes you would think the people of Colorado would quit talking and fix the problem.

 

[castle134]

But the vice president said get a shotgun for defense now CO can't have one

 

[pwoller]

Colorado is the overflow from California. Just a bunch of pansie ass, hippie, liberals that want to smoke pot and ban guns. Can we ban them and push them into the Pacific?

 

[TravisJ]

Yea, well it's for the children. Sorry for the law abiding citizens, but you are just gonna have to use a double barrel like Biden says.