No Firearms sign-New Haven IN

[Fishe39392]

So..I'm out for a leisurely stroll the other day when I happen to see this sign along a walking trail in a city park. Along this trail I saw 5 of these signs (yes I counted lol). It made me hardcore. Also, I happened to be carrying at the time too

 

[Hammerhead]

Looks like you might have had a good backstop in the body of water there, should have put a couple of rounds through it.

 

[Fishe39392]

The thought crossed my mind!

Looks like you might have had a good backstop in the body of water there, should have put a couple of rounds through it.

 

[dcahsr23]

you should be fine. The sign says "no firearms" you only had one lol.

 

[RoyalTenenbaum]

I think they mean don't throw your used murder weapons in the river.

 

[db1959]

I interpret the sign to mean no revolvers. You were carry a Glock, werent you?

 

[FWP9MM]

Walking along the river/secluded area is just more reason to carry.

 

[wolfman]

Actually, the sign is now against IN state law, and if the municipality still has a law on the books to go with the sign, you could bring legal action.

 

[gglass]

Actually, the sign is now against IN state law, and if the municipality still has a law on the books to go with the sign, you could bring legal action.

I see triple damages in the OP's future.

 

[dcahsr23]

Actually, the sign is now against IN state law, and if the municipality still has a law on the books to go with the sign, you could bring legal action.

i believe if the park is operated by DNR (not patrolled) then then can ban handguns. Last of my knowledge there wasnt any around that area.

 

[Sylvain]

The second sign that says "unless licenced by the state" is missing.

 

[MrSmitty]

I took it to mean no K-frame Smith and Wesson revolvers!

 

[Indy_Guy_77]

i believe if the park is operated by DNR (not patrolled) then then can ban handguns. Last of my knowledge there wasnt any around that area.

Not so.

DNR struck their administrative rule against firearms on their properties (specifically state parks) several years ago

 

[Fishe39392]

I interpret the sign to mean no revolvers. You were carry a Glock, werent you?

This was my first thought! I figured I'd be safe with my Glock!

 

[J_Wales]

Nothing screams mucking foron like a sign like that.

 

[SideArmed]

At the very least a phone call to whom ever operates the park is warrented to politely ask them to remove the signs. Perhaps they were just over looked. If they are short on volunteers maybe you could volunteer to do it for them (no purple implied).

 

[littletommy]

At the very least a phone call to whom ever operates the park is warrented to politely ask them to remove the signs. Perhaps they were just over looked. If they are short on volunteers maybe you could volunteer to do it for them (no purple implied).

+1 excellent suggestion!

 

[Titanium_Frost]

i believe if the park is operated by DNR (not patrolled) then then can ban handguns. Last of my knowledge there wasnt any around that area.

I propose a new rule on INGO...

If you state something like you know for a fact it is law then back it up by citing something. At least the thread you learned it on. I mean what are we? A gun shop on the internet? No reason for us to spread bad info like that. Its TOO EASY to look this stuff up I mean you ARE already on a dang computer!


Last I checked they all got Google, right?

 

[SideArmed]

Last I checked they all got Google, right?

I could afford that upgrade on mine, all I got with mine was Bing.

 

[Sylvain]

I propose a new rule on INGO...

If you state something like you know for a fact it is law then back it up by citing something. At least the thread you learned it on. I mean what are we? A gun shop on the internet? No reason for us to spread bad info like that. Its TOO EASY to look this stuff up I mean you ARE already on a dang computer!


Last I checked they all got Google, right?

I thought that as soon as we typed something on the internet it becomes a fact right away, therefore we dont need to back it up right?

Also it's not because you Google your facts to make sure that they are truelly facts that your results will be actual facts.
It all depends where you find your information, I think we all know that.
Last time I looked for something gun related on Google I found a post from INGO, that I wrote myself, on the first page of results.
So I knew it was pure BS lol, but someone else would have thought it was a fact because they found it on a serious gun forum on the serious internet.