No Gun Purchases Without Review of Your Social Media

[DoggyDaddy]

So... they want to examine your social media presence in order to exercise a constitutional right but requiring a valid picture id in order to vote is just too much of an infringement. Got it...

 

[NHT3]

No problem, shut it down and don't look back. That's what I did for Facebook a few years ago. News flash, you don't have any "friends" on Facebook. Friends are face to face people you know, love and trust.

[FONT=&amp]NRA Life Member / [/FONT]Basic Pistol instructor[FONT=&amp] / RSO[/FONT][FONT=&amp]

[/FONT][FONT=&amp]"Under pressure, you don't rise to the occasion, you sink to the level of your training. That's why we train so hard" [/FONT][FONT=&amp]
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Unnamed Navy Seal[/FONT][FONT=&amp]

[/FONT][FONT=&amp]“Ego is the reason many men do not shoot competition. They don't want to suck in public” [/FONT][FONT=&amp]
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Aron Bright[/FONT]

 

[actaeon277]

So... they want to examine your social media presence in order to exercise a constitutional right but requiring a valid picture id in order to vote is just too much of an infringement. Got it...

And when I've mentioned that, people have told me "your vote doesn't kill anyone".
My reply, "Oh really? A vote on who is in the government or what they do doesn't affect anyone dying? I though a vote for a certain party would kill millions. I thought a vote against the ACA was going to kill millions. Sounds like voting should be MORE restricted than guns. My gun can't kill millions."

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Sounds like we have some of them paranoid anti-government types posting in this thread.

I, for one, like our government overlords and....(how's the rest of it go?).

 

[Mongo59]

Welcome to the Pre-Crime era, smile for the retina cams...

 

[Mongo59]

It would be a short search for me.
I don't have, nor have I ever had, any accounts on Facebook, Twitter, Snap-Chat, Insta-Gram...

I'm on maybe a half-dozen firearms related websites, but Ingo is by far where I've been the most prolific.

I still think it's a VERY bad idea.
Who decides what is, or is not, socially acceptable, and what happened to, "...shall not be infringed"?

They don't consider it infringement as long as they have blatantly taken it away from you first...

 

[CraigAPS]

So... they want to examine your social media presence in order to exercise a constitutional right but requiring a valid picture id in order to vote is just too much of an infringement. Got it...

Even worse! They want to see how you use one constitutional right in order to allow you to use another. How does this equate to "common sense"??? I have a strong feeling "common sense" just isn't common enough anymore!

 

[Mongo59]

Official Government Constitutional Rights Distribution

Select no more than one from the following list:

A) Freedom of Speech
B) Right to Bear Arms