NPR airs segment on how the BATFE handles records

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ghitch75

    livin' in the sticks
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    117   0   0
    Dec 21, 2009
    13,512
    83
    Greene County
    when did it become law that FFLs had to retain 4473's for 20 years? I thought at first it was 1 year? Did it change or has it always been 20 years? Quick google and I can't find any details....

    -rvb

    just got my FFL a couple months ago and the nice BATF lady that did my interview said i have to keep them for 20 years.....
     

    rvb

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    6,396
    63
    IN (a refugee from MD)
    just got my FFL a couple months ago and the nice BATF lady that did my interview said i have to keep them for 20 years.....

    understood. My question was, has it always been 20 years? I seem to recall it was 1 yr originally but I'm not sure if I'm remembering right or when it might have changed to 20.

    -rvb
     

    rvb

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    6,396
    63
    IN (a refugee from MD)
    I lived in MD at the time of the "DC snipers." I heard rumors of folks who lived closer to the beltway who owned ARs getting visits from law enforcement who took their rifles to verify ballistics....

    Now MD does have an actual registry. I'm not sure if the above was executed by state officials or federal....

    -rvb
     

    CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Once all of the records are scanned in as images, it takes very little effort after that to OCR those images and extract the text for injection into a legitimate database. For this reason, I'm opposed to even the scanning of 4473s into images.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,030
    77
    Camby area
    Once all of the records are scanned in as images, it takes very little effort after that to OCR those images and extract the text for injection into a legitimate database. For this reason, I'm opposed to even the scanning of 4473s into images.

    Citation please.

    Handwriting OCR is INCREDIBLY difficult with today's technology.. But by all means if you know of OCR that reads our chicken scratch reliably I'd love to know who makes it. :)

    (I think that you think our technology is farther along than it is... But I do foresee the scanned images being OCR'd many years down the road if/when our tech catches up)
     

    Scutter01

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 21, 2008
    23,750
    48
    Citation please.

    Handwriting OCR is INCREDIBLY difficult with today's technology.. But by all means if you know of OCR that reads our chicken scratch reliably I'd love to know who makes it. :)

    No, it's not. I have a customer that does scanning and the enterprise-class scanning and OCR tech is unbelievably fast (hundreds of forms per minute) and accurate. Boxes of identical forms where every field is easily identifiable? Piece of cake. Did you know that's how places like American Legion processes the forms they mail to their members? I've seen it. It's damn impressive and it's orders of magnitude better than the crap OCR you can buy off the shelf from Fry's.

    There will be errors on many scanned forms, but they're automatically kicked out for manual review. You could have a dozen unpaid interns check those and correct them.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,910
    113
    More semantics games. (2) The information is collected and they do use it to "find who owns a particular weapon right now." The article told us how they do it! I

    Not semantics, a real and significant difference. Let's say you run across a certain CZ40B. You contact the ATF, they contact CZ, CZ says they shipped it to X Distributor. ATF contacts X distributor and they say they shipped it to 256 Sport & Garden. ATF contacts 256 Sport & Garden. If they can find the paperwork from 2000 or 2001, they can tell you I bought it. You still have no idea who currently owns it. You can contact me and ask if I still have it. I might talk to you, I might not. If I decide to talk to you, I can tell you I sold it to some guy named Robert. I don't know his last name, don't have any contact information for him, etc. There's a lot of Roberts in Indiana. You STILL don't know if Robert has the gun today or not. You have NO IDEA WHO OWNS THAT PARTICULAR WEAPON RIGHT NOW.

    You *might* be able to track down who owns a gun, you might not be able to. Compare that to a real registry or database. Barring theft or illegal transfer, you know exactly who has the item.
     

    CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    The USPS has used OCR technology built on Linux to automate letter routing for decades. As mentioned, when the forms are well structured and nature of the hand written data circumscribed, OCR gets really, really easy using modern technology.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,030
    77
    Camby area
    Did you know that's how places like American Legion processes the forms they mail to their members? I've seen it. It's damn impressive and it's orders of magnitude better than the crap OCR you can buy off the shelf from Fry's.

    There will be errors on many scanned forms, but they're automatically kicked out for manual review. You could have a dozen unpaid interns check those and correct them.

    I'm not talking about retail stuff. The only reliable stuff we found for our enterprise solution required the separated boxes or a divider to separate each character distinctly.

    If you know the name of that software let me know. Id love to have a look.
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,647
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Not semantics, a real and significant difference. Let's say you run across a certain CZ40B. You contact the ATF, they contact CZ, CZ says they shipped it to X Distributor. ATF contacts X distributor and they say they shipped it to 256 Sport & Garden. ATF contacts 256 Sport & Garden. If they can find the paperwork from 2000 or 2001, they can tell you I bought it. You still have no idea who currently owns it. You can contact me and ask if I still have it. I might talk to you, I might not. If I decide to talk to you, I can tell you I sold it to some guy named Robert. I don't know his last name, don't have any contact information for him, etc. There's a lot of Roberts in Indiana. You STILL don't know if Robert has the gun today or not. You have NO IDEA WHO OWNS THAT PARTICULAR WEAPON RIGHT NOW.

    You *might* be able to track down who owns a gun, you might not be able to. Compare that to a real registry or database. Barring theft or illegal transfer, you know exactly who has the item.

    Good post, that's pretty much it. When I was younger and living in MI my dad purchased a Taurus PT99 which was my second pistol, I transferred it to my name (registered it) and took it to CO when on active duty. Sold it to a buddy and he later traded it off as well. After the army I worked in a gun store in my hometown, ATF calls for a trace and it's that Taurus!! I said let me talk to them, told them the original purchaser was my dad and that pistol was sold in CO etc etc. There was never any follow-up and never heard from them again.
     

    Scutter01

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 21, 2008
    23,750
    48
    I'm not talking about retail stuff. The only reliable stuff we found for our enterprise solution required the separated boxes or a divider to separate each character distinctly.

    If you know the name of that software let me know. Id love to have a look.

    You need to call a document management company that specializes in it. Looking for something on your own isn't going to go well.
     

    rvb

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    6,396
    63
    IN (a refugee from MD)
    Not semantics, a real and significant difference. Let's say you run across a certain CZ40B. You contact the ATF, they contact CZ, CZ says they shipped it to X Distributor. ATF contacts X distributor and they say they shipped it to 256 Sport & Garden. ATF contacts 256 Sport & Garden. If they can find the paperwork from 2000 or 2001, they can tell you I bought it. You still have no idea who currently owns it. You can contact me and ask if I still have it. I might talk to you, I might not. If I decide to talk to you, I can tell you I sold it to some guy named Robert. I don't know his last name, don't have any contact information for him, etc. There's a lot of Roberts in Indiana. You STILL don't know if Robert has the gun today or not. You have NO IDEA WHO OWNS THAT PARTICULAR WEAPON RIGHT NOW.

    You *might* be able to track down who owns a gun, you might not be able to. Compare that to a real registry or database. Barring theft or illegal transfer, you know exactly who has the item.

    I guess that's just where we'll leave it on this... You see that as proof it's not a backdoor registry.... I see that as proof that it is an incomplete registry with holes/gaps (that certain politicians have said they want to close via UBC and closing the "gunshow loophole"). If UBCs had been passed, the examples you and drillsgt gave would have no longer been legal.

    -rvb
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,541
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Good post, that's pretty much it. When I was younger and living in MI my dad purchased a Taurus PT99 which was my second pistol, I transferred it to my name (registered it) and took it to CO when on active duty. Sold it to a buddy and he later traded it off as well. After the army I worked in a gun store in my hometown, ATF calls for a trace and it's that Taurus!! I said let me talk to them, told them the original purchaser was my dad and that pistol was sold in CO etc etc. There was never any follow-up and never heard from them again.

    Another anecdote: there was an artical in the Ft. Wayne JG where FWPD Chief Rusty buys and sells a revolver and then ten (or twenty?) years later the ATF shows up looking for it.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,910
    113
    I guess that's just where we'll leave it on this... You see that as proof it's not a backdoor registry.... I see that as proof that it is an incomplete registry with holes/gaps (that certain politicians have said they want to close via UBC and closing the "gunshow loophole"). If UBCs had been passed, the examples you and drillsgt gave would have no longer been legal.

    -rvb

    Which is why so many people were against UBCs. Not necessarily because of the checks themselves, but because of a registry being essential to UBC working.

    I'd also note that even if you believe its a partial registry, its a one way street. You can attempt to trace a S/N to find the owner, but you can't search for a name and see what guns that person has bought. Often we have people who have guns stolen and they don't know the S/N to put into the stolen database and they expect that I can just look it up in "the registry". If they recall when and where they bought it, they might be able to get the info from the gun store, but I have no way to get it.
     
    Top Bottom