NRA "F" rated senator says Judge Sotomayer is Pro-Gun?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • melensdad

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Apr 2, 2008
    24,062
    77
    Far West Suburban Lowellabama
    Well not exactly pro-gun. But anti-gun Senator Mark Udall (rated F by the NRA) wants us all to believe that Supreme Court Justice NOMINEE Sotomayer will uphold the 2nd Amendment. Says so right here:

    The Associated Press: Senator: Sotomayor accepts gun rights ruling
    Senator: Sotomayor accepts gun rights ruling
    By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS – 3 days ago

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A Democratic senator said Thursday that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor sees a 2008 ruling affirming Americans' right to own guns for self-defense as settled law.

    Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Sotomayor told him at a private meeting that she will work from the high court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller in future cases involving gun rights. The 5-4 ruling struck down the Washington, D.C., handgun ban and imperiled similar prohibitions in other cities.

    Gun rights activists have accused Sotomayor of being hostile to gun rights because she was part of a panel that ruled that the Second Amendment protection of the right to bear arms did not apply to state and local governments.

    In that case, Sotomayor and two other judges on the 2nd Circuit appeals court upheld a New York state law banning the possession of "chuka sticks." They said they were bound by an 1886 Supreme Court ruling, but acknowledged the high court could take a different view, particularly in light of the Heller ruling.

    Udall said he asked Sotomayor about her view of the Second Amendment during their visit. "Clearly she spoke to the fact that settled law is just that, and the Heller case has been considered by the court, and she sees that as the law, and she will work off of what the court decided as other cases may come to the court's attention," Udall said.

    Other senators have come away from their meetings with Sotomayor concerned about her position on gun rights.

    Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said Tuesday that he was disappointed that the judge refused to say during their visit that the Second Amendment "protects a fundamental right that applies to all Americans." DeMint said Sotomayor's statement on Heller "doesn't tell us much" about her view of the issue, noting that she stands by her ruling that held that the Second Amendment only protects against federal government curbs on the right to bear arms — not state or local limits.

    "(H)er opinion was that the hundreds of millions of Americans in the 50 states do not have a fundamental right to bear arms. She refused to back away from that opinion in my meeting with her," DeMint said Thursday.​
     

    Field King

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Oct 26, 2008
    957
    18
    Well not exactly pro-gun. But anti-gun Senator Mark Udall (rated F by the NRA) wants us all to believe that Supreme Court Justice NOMINEE Sotomayer will uphold the 2nd Amendment. Says so right here:

    The Associated Press: Senator: Sotomayor accepts gun rights ruling
    Senator: Sotomayor accepts gun rights ruling
    By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS – 3 days ago

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A Democratic senator said Thursday that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor sees a 2008 ruling affirming Americans' right to own guns for self-defense as settled law.

    Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Sotomayor told him at a private meeting that she will work from the high court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller in future cases involving gun rights. The 5-4 ruling struck down the Washington, D.C., handgun ban and imperiled similar prohibitions in other cities.

    Gun rights activists have accused Sotomayor of being hostile to gun rights because she was part of a panel that ruled that the Second Amendment protection of the right to bear arms did not apply to state and local governments.

    In that case, Sotomayor and two other judges on the 2nd Circuit appeals court upheld a New York state law banning the possession of "chuka sticks." They said they were bound by an 1886 Supreme Court ruling, but acknowledged the high court could take a different view, particularly in light of the Heller ruling.

    Udall said he asked Sotomayor about her view of the Second Amendment during their visit. "Clearly she spoke to the fact that settled law is just that, and the Heller case has been considered by the court, and she sees that as the law, and she will work off of what the court decided as other cases may come to the court's attention," Udall said.

    Other senators have come away from their meetings with Sotomayor concerned about her position on gun rights.

    Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said Tuesday that he was disappointed that the judge refused to say during their visit that the Second Amendment "protects a fundamental right that applies to all Americans." DeMint said Sotomayor's statement on Heller "doesn't tell us much" about her view of the issue, noting that she stands by her ruling that held that the Second Amendment only protects against federal government curbs on the right to bear arms — not state or local limits.

    "(H)er opinion was that the hundreds of millions of Americans in the 50 states do not have a fundamental right to bear arms. She refused to back away from that opinion in my meeting with her," DeMint said Thursday.
    I am not even going to investigate her record, the fact Hussein Obama believes in her tells me all I need to know!
     

    rkba_net

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 26, 2008
    94
    6
    Should a Supreme Court nominee give a public opinion on an issue (any issue) that she knows is most probably going to be heard by the court? I would hope not...
     
    Top Bottom