I'd also like to point out the incredible irony that has transcribed over the past few posts....
lonehoosier, you stated you do not own a bump stock, don't intend to, and you claimed it was technique that gave the weapon an auto-like rate of fire. You appear to know nothing on the subject, YET you defended it because you FELT or FEEL like YOUR RIGHTS are being infringed upon even though you apparently know not what you're defending.
Reasoning? Not one more inch. You FEEL as though your rights are being threatened. Emotional response.
You then proceeded to tell me that I was giving you an emotional scenario to try and say, support? My case, if that's what we should call it. In fact I was just stating a real life posdible scenario not based on anything emotional at all and just wanted to see if you saw the logic behind that.
The old, put your self in the other guy's shoes kind of thinking.
I am then told that that's trying to play on emotions, when emotions are what's eliciting your response from the get go.
If anyone is studying psychology this would be a great place to obsrrve why people think they do what they do without actually thinking through it.
If you take a minute and read everything you wrote do you see what I'm referring to? Do you see how it looks like you're acting on fear of the possibility of having your gun rights taken away when that isn't being proposed, actually you proposed banning magazines in your post.
Nothing intellectual ever follows "what's next?" I'm sure you can think of some comical classics.
I really just wanted you to go back and read what you wrote. The irony is unreal.
Thanks. I'm not trying to single you iut I just wanted you to realize the irony in how things transpired.
lonehoosier, you stated you do not own a bump stock, don't intend to, and you claimed it was technique that gave the weapon an auto-like rate of fire. You appear to know nothing on the subject, YET you defended it because you FELT or FEEL like YOUR RIGHTS are being infringed upon even though you apparently know not what you're defending.
Reasoning? Not one more inch. You FEEL as though your rights are being threatened. Emotional response.
You then proceeded to tell me that I was giving you an emotional scenario to try and say, support? My case, if that's what we should call it. In fact I was just stating a real life posdible scenario not based on anything emotional at all and just wanted to see if you saw the logic behind that.
The old, put your self in the other guy's shoes kind of thinking.
I am then told that that's trying to play on emotions, when emotions are what's eliciting your response from the get go.
If anyone is studying psychology this would be a great place to obsrrve why people think they do what they do without actually thinking through it.
If you take a minute and read everything you wrote do you see what I'm referring to? Do you see how it looks like you're acting on fear of the possibility of having your gun rights taken away when that isn't being proposed, actually you proposed banning magazines in your post.
Nothing intellectual ever follows "what's next?" I'm sure you can think of some comical classics.
I really just wanted you to go back and read what you wrote. The irony is unreal.
Thanks. I'm not trying to single you iut I just wanted you to realize the irony in how things transpired.