Twangbanger
Grandmaster
- Oct 9, 2010
- 7,100
- 113
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Oh. My. God. What did I just watch?
- Thread starter Bill of Rights
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I have never counted but the thread is heavily followed.
It's funny to watch him debate the more mentally vacant, but people with more than 2 braincells to rub together can usually call him on his tricks.
Shapiro is a talented debater. He isn't right, he's just good at convincing you that he is. Unless you subscribe to neocon beliefs, then obviously you'll think he's the second coming.
Shapiro is a talented debater. He isn't right, he's just good at convincing you that he is. Unless you subscribe to neocon beliefs, then obviously you'll think he's the second coming.
Can you show your work? Examples?
I wish Shapiro either posted transcripts of his videos or his voice was less nasal and half an octave deeper
I have to agree with you on this. He is hard for me to listen to.
He kind of reminds me of a young Jeff Gordon. Just in terms of his looks and tone of voice.
I like Ben Shapiro and agree with him most of the time. There are times where he sticks his foot in his mouth and says pretty dumb stuff. He also comes off as smug at times. But he is a good debater and uses effective techniques. I wouldn't call them "tricks."
[video=youtube_share;JY5t6iUzajk]http://youtu.be/JY5t6iUzajk[/video]
I think the REAL 'liberals' (often self-identified as 'classical liberals') and REAL 'conservatives' (sometimes self-identified as 'Constitutionalists') are finding out that they actually have much in common with the nation's founders, who by today's definitions would pretty much come out as libertarian.
So there IS lots of common ground between people stereotypically on 'opposite' sides, just like how the 'authoritarians' or 'statists' from BOTH left and right always have a government 'solution' or 'program' for whatever is going on.
Unfortunately, federal elections don't allow voting for more than one candidate, like many county and local elections do, so we always have to vote for 'the lesser evil', which is usually a RINO.
Probably the single most significant blunder in the Constitution is failing to make sure we wouldn't degenerate into a two-party system (in fact, I don't think they wanted 'political parties' at all).
So there IS lots of common ground between people stereotypically on 'opposite' sides, just like how the 'authoritarians' or 'statists' from BOTH left and right always have a government 'solution' or 'program' for whatever is going on.
Unfortunately, federal elections don't allow voting for more than one candidate, like many county and local elections do, so we always have to vote for 'the lesser evil', which is usually a RINO.
Probably the single most significant blunder in the Constitution is failing to make sure we wouldn't degenerate into a two-party system (in fact, I don't think they wanted 'political parties' at all).
