Considering she is a teacher I would consider one of the large negative implications of her getting her masters.
It makes her virtually "unhireable". What do I mean by that? My wife and several relatives are also school teachers. One thing I've noticed in the teaching world is that people with master's degrees have a VERY hard time finding a job. In most instances even though the admin/HR will pay more for a master's, the reality is that the school does NOT want to pay more for a teaching position that can be filled by somebody without the master's. Therefore a non-master's teacher will be chosen over the master's teacher in many instances.
I know it sounds completely bass-ackwards, but it's the way it is. So for the time being, it will gain your wife additional income, but in the long-run, if you ever relocate, budget changes dictate personnel changes in her school and she is let go, etc, she may find it difficult to find another teaching job. The only thing I think she may have going for her is years of experience. While it may be hard to find a job with a master's degree I think that's primarily an issue for lesser experienced master's holders. Her years of experience may help to offset the negative of the masters...
JMHO... my wife is a teacher and has no desire to get her masters because she knows several people with master's degrees working $8/hr teacher's aide positions because the school can't afford to pay them the higher rate the master's commands if they were brought on as contracted teachers.
By not getting a masters we would be passing up on close to half a million dollars over her career.
Considering she is a teacher I would consider one of the large negative implications of her getting her masters.
It makes her virtually "unhireable". What do I mean by that? My wife and several relatives are also school teachers. One thing I've noticed in the teaching world is that people with master's degrees have a VERY hard time finding a job. In most instances even though the admin/HR will pay more for a master's, the reality is that the school does NOT want to pay more for a teaching position that can be filled by somebody without the master's. Therefore a non-master's teacher will be chosen over the master's teacher in many instances.
I know it sounds completely bass-ackwards, but it's the way it is. So for the time being, it will gain your wife additional income, but in the long-run, if you ever relocate, budget changes dictate personnel changes in her school and she is let go, etc, she may find it difficult to find another teaching job. The only thing I think she may have going for her is years of experience. While it may be hard to find a job with a master's degree I think that's primarily an issue for lesser experienced master's holders. Her years of experience may help to offset the negative of the masters...
JMHO... my wife is a teacher and has no desire to get her masters because she knows several people with master's degrees working $8/hr teacher's aide positions because the school can't afford to pay them the higher rate the master's commands if they were brought on as contracted teachers.
My wife's a teacher. She did her Master's degree immediately after graduating undergrad - both at UIndy.
CB19 is pretty much spot on about relocating / hiring. Teachers with master's degrees (that are often REQUIRED to be earned by the IN DOE) are almost locked in to their employer once they've earned their master's degree. Partly because the Union won't allow them to take less pay - even if they WANT to take less pay. There are indeed exceptions to all of this, of course.
My wife needs out of her job in a bad way. It's slowly sucking the life out of her. But we simply cannot replicate her income elsewhere.
I am in education (sadly) and I think things are changing up to where having your masters will help you not hurt you on getting hired. But that's because they will basically pay you the same no matter what... Basically what I've discovered is due to recent years, don't be a teacher! I am trying to get out at least!
So the union is not helping?
If she is looking at ED, BSU has a lot of different ways she could go both higher ed or with high school ed.
So the union is not helping?
So the union is not helping?
I understand that; I'm simply pointing out the possible negatives. I think the other replies made it clear that it's not just a localized problem, it's widespread. I know of a lady that has been out of college for 9 years now with a Masters in Education. She was working as an aide in the school system my wife is in when my wife first started there (also as an aide, fresh out of school). My wife is in her 3rd year of teaching, and this other lady is still just an aide. Why? Why after 9 years has she not "gained" a teaching job? The explanation is simple; the union has bargained that Master's holders get paid more money, the school will not hire a master's holder because they cost more money for the same job. IE, master's holders find it VERY difficult to actually get a job teaching.By not getting a masters we would be passing up on close to half a million dollars over her career.