Political funny pictures thread, part V *** If I don't laugh, I'll cry***

[jamil]

I did say "...remove both parties and ... start anew without them...."

And "you can say this but not that" is automatically an infringement of free speech, IMHO.

Exactly why is it OK to call someone a "cracker" or any other slur, but only one group has their pejorative referenced as "the N word"? Not that any of them are OK, but why does that one get special treatment?

Blessings,
Bill

Check your privilege. It is problematic to claim that white people using the n-word is equivalent to a person of color using “cracker”. All people of color share the collective experience of oppression that white people, as the collective oppressors, cannot understand or defend. Therefore, calling white people cracker is justified. White people using the n-word, regardless of context, is oppression. Denying this is is called “white frigidity”. And yes, it’s a real thing that white people have as evidenced by the existence of words to describe it. And if you say that’s circular reasoning, you’re just using a tool of the white male patriarchy to oppress women and people of color.

 

[nonobaddog]

Check your privilege. It is problematic to claim that white people using the n-word is equivalent to a person of color using “cracker”. All people of color share the collective experience of oppression that white people, as the collective oppressors, cannot understand or defend. Therefore, calling white people cracker is justified. White people using the n-word, regardless of context, is oppression. Denying this is is called “white frigidity”. And yes, it’s a real thing that white people have as evidenced by the existence of words to describe it. And if you say that’s circular reasoning, you’re just using a tool of the white male patriarchy to oppress women and people of color.

Your logic is proof of the existence of sasquatch, chupacabra, lock ness monster and the great pumpkin. I knew it was true!!

 

[Ruger_Ronin]

Check your privilege. It is problematic to claim that white people using the n-word is equivalent to a person of color using “cracker”. All people of color share the collective experience of oppression that white people, as the collective oppressors, cannot understand or defend. Therefore, calling white people cracker is justified. White people using the n-word, regardless of context, is oppression. Denying this is is called “white frigidity”. And yes, it’s a real thing that white people have as evidenced by the existence of words to describe it. And if you say that’s circular reasoning, you’re just using a tool of the white male patriarchy to oppress women and people of color.

WTAF did I just read?

 

[Slapstick]

Let's get back to a few pics before this thread really goes off the rails.

 

[red_zr24x4]

WTAF did I just read?

IKR

 

[2A_Tom]

WTAF did I just read?

One of the ingo apologists.

 

[Phase2]

 

[IndyBeerman]

This is GREAT, I just about spewed my Coke Zero onto my keyboard. Only improvement would to have some flames coming off the edges of the top. ROTFLMAO

 

[Bill of Rights]

Check your privilege. It is problematic to claim that white people using the n-word is equivalent to a person of color using “cracker”. All people of color share the collective experience of oppression that white people, as the collective oppressors, cannot understand or defend. Therefore, calling white people cracker is justified. White people using the n-word, regardless of context, is oppression. Denying this is is called “white frigidity”. And yes, it’s a real thing that white people have as evidenced by the existence of words to describe it. And if you say that’s circular reasoning, you’re just using a tool of the white male patriarchy to oppress women and people of color.

In the first place, I *did* say “or any other slur”.

In the second place, and I say this with all due respect, the post to which I’m replying is so full of , it could be used to fertilize a farm the size of Wyoming.

That is all.

Blessings,
Bill

 

[wtburnette]

Check your privilege. It is problematic to claim that white people using the n-word is equivalent to a person of color using “cracker”. All people of color share the collective experience of oppression that white people, as the collective oppressors, cannot understand or defend. Therefore, calling white people cracker is justified. White people using the n-word, regardless of context, is oppression. Denying this is is called “white frigidity”. And yes, it’s a real thing that white people have as evidenced by the existence of words to describe it. And if you say that’s circular reasoning, you’re just using a tool of the white male patriarchy to oppress women and people of color.

Really hoping you just forgot the purple.

 

[Spear Dane]

Really hoping you just forgot the purple.

No kidding.

 

[eldirector]

Thanks to the thread, I have checked my privilege. It is still there. Now going to go oppress some black coffee. Maybe a blueberry muffin.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Thanks to the thread, I have checked my privilege. It is still there. Now going to go oppress some black coffee. Maybe a blueberry muffin.

Ebony, and blueberry... live together in perfect harmony...

 

[Phase2]

and it didn't take some woke scold to make it happen.

 

[epeery]

And opens its eyes.

 

[jamil]

In the first place, I *did* say “or any other slur”.

In the second place, and I say this with all due respect, the post to which I’m replying is so full of , it could be used to fertilize a farm the size of Wyoming.

That is all.

Blessings,
Bill

I have learned to speak postmodern/intersectional/woke drivel.

 

[Phase2]

I have learned to speak postmodern/intersectional/woke drivel.

Congratulations ??

 

[Phase2]

 

[Phase2]

Okay, probably more sad but true...

 

[jamil]

Really hoping you just forgot the purple.

I don’t use purple. It’s not good sarcasm if you already know it’s sarcasm.