Presidential Debate 3 - 10/22

[GREEN607]

My title might indicate that I expect Romney to bring a Ruger S/A Rimfire rifle to the debate.

But seriously; I expect and hope to see a lot of different Foreign Policy subjects to come up. I think a 'replay' of the Benghazi debacle issue will certainly be one.... but I hope that ALL of the points on my following list, are covered to some substantial degree.

China

Iran

Israel

Afghanistan

Syria

N Korea/S. Korea

"Arab Spring"

al-Quaida

NATO

and the U.N.

What areas would you like to see debated, on Foreign Policy???

 

[Willie]

Obamna will say repeatedly - Osama is dead... the LSM will swoon.

 

[miguel]

Which Commie is moderating this one?

 

[sepe]

Which Commie is moderating this one?

I'm not sure but I think it is either Jon Stewart, Daniel Tosh, or Bob Schieffer.

 

[ABolt243]

I'm not sure but I think it is either Jon Stewart, Daniel Tosh, or Bob Schieffer.

I believe it's Bob Schieffer. Same format as #1.

 

[Survivalcookie]

I would like them to debate how the cuts in the military budget due to sequestration will effect our readiness to deploy should one or more of the hot spots in the world flare. How the cuts would effect us policing the oceans for drug smugglers, How the cuts would effect us sending aid in a natural disaster. I would also like to know where all the men being cut from service because of down sizing are going to get jobs. Our military has always been the number one employer.

 

[bwframe]

Romney needs to be better prepared to handle whatever silly stupid surprise may be introduced to push him back on his heals. DONT let it happen again.

 

[GREEN607]

I would like them to debate how the cuts in the military budget due to sequestration will effect our readiness to deploy should one or more of the hot spots in the world flare. How the cuts would effect us policing the oceans for drug smugglers, How the cuts would effect us sending aid in a natural disaster. I would also like to know where all the men being cut from service because of down sizing are going to get jobs. Our military has always been the number one employer.

Excellent point!

 

[GREEN607]

I believe it's Bob Schieffer. Same format as #1.

This would be correct.

 

[sepe]

I believe it's Bob Schieffer. Same format as #1.

It would be so much more entertaining with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert sharing a joint moderator position.

 

[hoosierdoc]

It would be so much more entertaining with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert sharing a joint moderator position.

Obama has spent enough time with Stewart this cycle already. Stewart has asked him more questions than the entire press corp in months.

 

[bwframe]

It would be so much more entertaining with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert sharing a joint moderator position.

Better yet, someone apolitical. Maybe Big Bird, Mike Rowe?

 

[hoosierdoc]

Better yet, someone apolitical. Maybe Big Bird, Mike Rowe?

[ame]http://youtu.be/-KQTXMS_qc0[/ame]

 

[bwframe]

http://youtu.be/-KQTXMS_qc0

Mike Rowe: ‘Dirty Jobs’ Host Says He Did Not Endorse Mitt Romney

Mike Rowe:

???

 

[GREEN607]

Mike Rowe: ‘Dirty Jobs’ Host Says He Did Not Endorse Mitt Romney

Mike Rowe:

???

OK. So what's your point?

Are you saying he WOULD or WOULD NOT make a good debate moderator?

Are you implying he IS or IS NOT impartial?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Romney needs to be better prepared to handle whatever silly stupid surprise may be introduced to push him back on his heals. DONT let it happen again.

Romney should win, but I doubt it will be a runaway. His speech at VMI is sure to be quoted often by Obama.

 

[rgrimm01]

Caught a little of O backpeddling concerning the Bengazi debacle (on TV last night while at work)... Would appear that he was trying to get all the intel accurate from the CIA prior to any announcement?

 

[jamil]

Romney needs to be better prepared to handle whatever silly stupid surprise may be introduced to push him back on his heals. DONT let it happen again.

Rather than make accusations like he did about Benghazi, Romney should just ask questions that he already knows the answer, and knows the President can't answer truthfully.

Whether or not the President mentioned an "act of terror" on the day after, if he knew then that it was a terrorist operation why did the administration insist that it was a reaction to a video thereafter for two weeks? Why did Hilary insist that it was the video? Why did the UN Ambassador, in appearances on all the major Sunday shows, insist that it was the video? Why was Obama's UN speech filled with rhetoric about "the future does not belong to those who slander the profit...", instead of calling it an act of terrorism, if Obama already knew it was a terrorist act?

Answering those questions truthfully would put Obama out of the race, and he knows it. But, just asking those unanswerable questions that the media won't dare ask is much better than accusing Obama of anything directly. Obama's non-answers should confirm any open minded person's suspensions that Obama knew all along that it was a terrorist attack, and that he/his administration tried to cover it up.

 

[GREEN607]

Rather than make accusations like he did about Benghazi, Romney should just ask questions that he already knows the answer, and knows the President can't answer truthfully.

Whether or not the President mentioned an "act of terror" on the day after, if he knew then that it was a terrorist operation why did the administration insist that it was a reaction to a video thereafter for two weeks? Why did Hilary insist that it was the video? Why did the UN Ambassador, in appearances on all the major Sunday shows, insist that it was the video? Why was Obama's UN speech filled with rhetoric about "the future does not belong to those who slander the profit...", instead of calling it an act of terrorism, if Obama already knew it was a terrorist act?

Answering those questions truthfully would put Obama out of the race, and he knows it. But, just asking those unanswerable questions that the media won't dare ask is much better than accusing Obama of anything directly. Obama's non-answers should confirm any open minded person's suspensions that Obama knew all along that it was a terrorist attack, and that he/his administration tried to cover it up.

To add to this, and you can bet Romney will find a way to bring this up at the next debate (whether Scheiffer does, or not)..... documents from the Benghazi consulate, released today, that were directly from Amb. Stevens to the State Dept.... show that he asked for more security 44 days before the attack, again 30 days before the attack, one week before the attack, AND ON THE DAY OF THE ATTACK (9/11). His request to the State Dept one week before the attack stated, "As of tomorrow, we will be down to 2 security personell at this consulate location."

Obama and Biden can spin this any way they want, but I truly believe.... THEY KNEW THIS SITUATION BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11TH, and were afraid that "beefing up security" by us (the U.S. GOVT) would offend the Libyans.