BrewerGeorge
Sharpshooter
I've been adding some long-term food storage to my stockpiles recently. It's so irritating to shop for this stuff.
Industry-wide, the definition of "serving" and "meal" has been set around 300 Calories, and a "day" is defined as two of these "meals." That's 600 Calories per day. While that's certainly better than nothing, it's far from a minimum long-term ration. They do this because decades ago, somebody decided that 600 Calories per day was the minimum survival ration for lifeboat survivors, but that tiny amount doesn't support any kind of activity at all. You need to double or treble that if you actually want to do something. That's why each pack of stuff like Mountain Home is two "servings" to make up an actual meal.
To get a real day, you have to double up each meal and add another lunch. So basically, you have to divide any time listed by three to get to a realistic 1800 Calorie day. A 30 man*day pack is really good for 10 days - tripling the cost per day of course. The irritating part is that this required math messes us packaging and leads to odd remainders. For instance, 10 "servings" is pretty typical for a bulk pack of freeze-dried (#10 can or large pouch). With real serving sizes, that's not ten meals, but five. So for 2 people, that's 2 1/2 meals, but for 3 people, it's not enough for 2 meals. If your family is 4 people, it's even worse. All these remainders will, of course, get eaten to round out the calories for a typical family (dad gets a little more kind of thing), but that means that realistically you can't just divide by three like the bulk math would tell you. It all makes planning unnecessarily difficult.
The bad thing is that they don't need to do this. People don't buy this stuff to pinch pennies but because they want long-term food security. Everybody knows the reality, so they're not fooling anybody. And freeze-dried, 25-year food is not that expensive in bulk - about $1 for each 200 Cal. I'm willing to pay whatever it costs, I just wish they didn't make it so hard to figure out how much food you're getting.
Industry-wide, the definition of "serving" and "meal" has been set around 300 Calories, and a "day" is defined as two of these "meals." That's 600 Calories per day. While that's certainly better than nothing, it's far from a minimum long-term ration. They do this because decades ago, somebody decided that 600 Calories per day was the minimum survival ration for lifeboat survivors, but that tiny amount doesn't support any kind of activity at all. You need to double or treble that if you actually want to do something. That's why each pack of stuff like Mountain Home is two "servings" to make up an actual meal.
To get a real day, you have to double up each meal and add another lunch. So basically, you have to divide any time listed by three to get to a realistic 1800 Calorie day. A 30 man*day pack is really good for 10 days - tripling the cost per day of course. The irritating part is that this required math messes us packaging and leads to odd remainders. For instance, 10 "servings" is pretty typical for a bulk pack of freeze-dried (#10 can or large pouch). With real serving sizes, that's not ten meals, but five. So for 2 people, that's 2 1/2 meals, but for 3 people, it's not enough for 2 meals. If your family is 4 people, it's even worse. All these remainders will, of course, get eaten to round out the calories for a typical family (dad gets a little more kind of thing), but that means that realistically you can't just divide by three like the bulk math would tell you. It all makes planning unnecessarily difficult.
The bad thing is that they don't need to do this. People don't buy this stuff to pinch pennies but because they want long-term food security. Everybody knows the reality, so they're not fooling anybody. And freeze-dried, 25-year food is not that expensive in bulk - about $1 for each 200 Cal. I'm willing to pay whatever it costs, I just wish they didn't make it so hard to figure out how much food you're getting.