WHO get's to decide what is and isn't "lawful entry"? I'll bet it won't be the property owner.
I don't believe the state will give up it's new found power/control so easily.
It wasn't the state, it was the courts ruling, and our attorney general had an issue with their decision immediately.
My meaning wasn't to infer it was the State of Indiana, should have been more specific. Besides, how many times has a court over ruled the wishes of the electorate.
I stopped counting when I had to take my socks off..
It is outlined vaguely in the article, probably quite more specifically in the bill.WHO get's to decide what is and isn't "lawful entry"? I'll bet it won't be the property owner.
I don't believe the state will give up it's new found power/control so easily.