Romney Job 1: Economy, Job 2: Porn

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ted

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 19, 2012
    5,081
    36
    Aren't there better things to do? Seriously.

    He likely attributes the over prevalence of pornography as a major contribution to an immoral, crumbling America; and wishes to empower the American people to make a choice in viewing the same.
     

    Titanium_Frost

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   0
    Feb 6, 2011
    7,608
    83
    Southwestern Indiana
    He likely attributes the over prevalence of pornography as a major contribution to an immoral, crumbling America; and wishes to empower the American people to make a choice in viewing the same.

    Here's an idea: Do your job, mind your business and LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE!

    Why do people in America think the government should be in our everyday lives so damn much? We literally can't do anything without SOME sort of government interference.

    I will from this day forward never say or type the word government, it has now become Nannyment.
     

    level.eleven

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 12, 2009
    4,673
    48
    Here's an idea: Do your job, mind your business and LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE!

    Why do people in America think the government should be in our everyday lives so damn much? We literally can't do anything without SOME sort of government interference.

    I will from this day forward never say or type the word government, it has now become Nannyment.

    Fundamentalists. There is a voting block amongst the conservatives that has no problem legislating their brand of morally. Romney happens to belong to one such group. Read up on Prop 8 in California.
     
    Rating - 100%
    42   0   0
    Apr 14, 2011
    907
    18
    Reality
    Fundamentalists. There is a voting block amongst the conservatives that has no problem legislating their brand of morally. Romney happens to belong to one such group. Read up on Prop 8 in California.

    EVERYONE in power legislates their morality these days...only "Fundamentalists" are smeared for it.
     

    Titanium_Frost

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   0
    Feb 6, 2011
    7,608
    83
    Southwestern Indiana
    Fundamentalists. There is a voting block amongst the conservatives that has no problem legislating their brand of morally. Romney happens to belong to one such group. Read up on Prop 8 in California.

    Oh I know all about it, I used to be one of them. I come from a very conservative Christian background, raised Southern Baptist and was taught all about family values and right and wrong vs moral and immoral.

    I also believed that if it was good for me it was good for everyone and why not have our Nannyment legislate the same way?

    I have since learned that whether right or wrong my type of morals work for me, not necessarily everyone and Nannyment should have no part playing a role in people's morals. I guess that makes me more of a Libertarian than a Conservative and I'm ok with that.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,050
    113
    Mitchell
    It's a shame that the pop culture has coursened so badly, people feel they have to turn to .gov for help. I also see this type of activism as an example of how progressivism has inculcated so many people with the idea that they are helpless to effect change without the force of the .gov.

    I agree, the federal government should stay out of this debate--leave it to the states and the people to decide how to govern themselves.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,050
    113
    Mitchell
    It's a shame that the pop culture has coursened so badly, people feel they have to turn to .gov for help. I also see this type of activism as an example of how progressivism has inculcated so many people with the idea that they are helpless to effect change without the force of the .gov. (Even "conservatives").

    I agree, the federal government should stay out of this debate--leave it to the states and the people to decide how to govern themselves.
     

    manwithnoname

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 25, 2012
    410
    16
    Aren't there better things to do? Seriously.

    Yes, there are better things to do.

    Among such things is abiding by the Constitution.

    Folks don't care about that though.

    So instead, the federal executive will promise to create jobs and kill porn and provide healthcare...none of which are within the Constitutional definition of the executive's role.

    Give some bread. Produce a circus. The people will enslave themselves.
     

    Titanium_Frost

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   0
    Feb 6, 2011
    7,608
    83
    Southwestern Indiana
    The Roman empire. They provided loaves of bread at the Circus Maximus, (the Colosseum). The games kept them amused and the bread kept them fed. All at the expense of the tax payers.

    Thanks but I should have clarified: I knew the origins of the quote but I was wondering what spurred its revival as of late.

    The first one I saw using it was Jeremy, he is a great guy but I question how many original thoughts he has sometimes :D :laugh:
     

    Bunnykid68

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Mar 2, 2010
    23,515
    83
    Cave of Caerbannog
    Thanks but I should have clarified: I knew the origins of the quote but I was wondering what spurred its revival as of late.

    The first one I saw using it was Jeremy, he is a great guy but I question how many original thoughts he has sometimes :D :laugh:
    Dang, this is the first time I have ever heard the term used at all. No faulting you for questioning Jeremy, be sure to be nice to his mom at the holidays:D
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,199
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    Oh I know all about it, I used to be one of them. I come from a very conservative Christian background, raised Southern Baptist and was taught all about family values and right and wrong vs moral and immoral.

    I also believed that if it was good for me it was good for everyone and why not have our Nannyment legislate the same way?

    I have since learned that whether right or wrong my type of morals work for me, not necessarily everyone and Nannyment should have no part playing a role in people's morals. I guess that makes me more of a Libertarian than a Conservative and I'm ok with that.

    Everyone in government seems okay with 'legislating morality'; otherwise why would the Supreme Court find it permissible to murder a defenseless child, and why would the Supremes declare that citizens may be forced into a contract or taxed if they don't do so? Or why would the Supremes and Congress continually allow [STRIKE]discrimination[/STRIKE]unequal treatment before the law on the basis of race, religion, creed or sexual orientation?
     

    manwithnoname

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 25, 2012
    410
    16
    What kind of bread would you like with your circus?

    I would offer you Cinnamon, but that spiced bread has been banned under the laws preserving the dead body of Liberty.
     
    Top Bottom