Ruger 10/22 decision

[brogers261990]

Hey folks, I'm looking to invest in a Ruger 10/22 in the near future and have a question I am looking for some help on. I've got the choice between the standard 10/22 or the takedown model. While I do like the takedown model, is there any chance that my accuracy could be compromised by having a barrel that is designed to come off / back on readily? I know that to an extent, barrels are designed to be able to be changed out, but I haven't heard much feedback on any differences in performance between models.

 

[EvilElmo]

No comment on the accuracy because I have no experience with the takedown model, but one thing to consider is what kind of customization you want to do to the rifle. I haven't done any research personally but I would think your stock options are far fewer with the takedown model, for example.

 

[TJ Kackowski]

If you search the forums, you'll find plenty of discussion about this very topic.

In a nutshell, there's no loss of zero or accuracy with a Ruger 10/22 takedown for field shooting and plinking. If you're a bulls-eye shooter ... well ... you won't be satisfied with the results.

 

[IncendiaryGunner]

I have a takedown, and love it.

EvilElmo has a good point - the stock being unique from the standard 10/22 does alter your options. I have seen people cut many stocks to fit however, and I believe the Hogue overmolded is now offered for the takedown also.

As far as accuracy goes, mine has been a tack driver. I have not performed a scientific comparision between the takedown and a standard or bull barrel 10/22, and I would not be surprised if there were slight differences from a lead sled - but compared to the 10/22 I had as a kid, I "feel" it is no less accurate.

I think if you are going to be shooting it competitively, a bull barrel and custom trigger/stock would likely be the natural choice. For purposes like mine - plinking / backpacking - I think the takedown is the natural choice, with the downside being the higher cost (considering you pay a significant premium for the takedown option).

 

[medcoxo]

Barrel stock options are fewer on the takedown, but any other options upgrades work on both. Out of the box, they are the same, but once you start adding barrels and stocks, then the standard comes out on top.

 

[Thegeek]

Takedown is a novelty unless you actually need to break it down and transport. Other than limiting choices for aftermarket stocks, there's no real drawback. But a 10/22 is lot like an AR. Once you get one, you start customizing.....

 

[Sniper 79]

I have had several 10-22's over the years. The best shooting and most accurate was the K10-22T which is their bull target model. It has a better trigger, stock, and barrel. Like others have stated above, the standard is a great choice for hunting and general light target plinking. If you want to get serious and even do some hunting the bull is the ticket. I also wouldn't consider a take down unless I absolutely needed that feature. I think it would rob some accuracy and be a pain to deal with.

Pretty much done with 22LR overall. If I was to get another 10-22 it would be Magnum Research 10-22 magnum although 900 bucks for a rim fire isn't going to happen.

 

[Bfish]

I've got a 22 take down and as far as I can tell it shoots just as well as any other 10/22 out of the box. I may buy a second threaded one and it may not be a take down but only because for the most part I don't need the take down feature unless I'm throwing it in the car to go somewhere.

 

[Hookeye]

10/22 and investement............don't really go together unless you buy an old sporter, international or standard of very low serial #.
Heard clean fingergrooves are getting 400-500.
Saw a checkered (factory) fingergroove fetch 1150 recently, no box or papers (was used but not mint).

 

[Hookeye]

Best looking IMHO is the Holy Grail of 10/22s.............'66-'71 sporter, factory checkered (IIRC reportedly a $20 option back then). Some had nicely figured stocks. Heard that Workman's book says 535 made but may not be all inclusive, so experts say maybe around 550 or so.

 

[sloughfoot]

I own several 10-22 rifles. One is a takedown. None are smallbore bullseye accurate. Not even the heavy barrel custom stock job that is cool but not up to the standard.

All of my 10-22's are capable of emptying the brain bucket of a squirrel. Including the take down.

 

[roscott]

I have a takedown model, and previously owned a standard. I have not seen any distinguishable difference in accuracy.

 

[Hookeye]

IIRC Clark used to make a 20" bbl, match, or regular bbl profile.
That with a repro fingergroove stock might make for a darn good looking squirrel sniper.

 

[Hookeye]

I might yet buy an old '75 model found at a shop...........bit might .920 it with a blued fluted and slap it in desert camo stock.
Really like the Anschtutz silhouette style stocks.
Could get expen$ive...............like the crap in my safe that doesn't get used needs more company.

 

[hopper68]

Ruger is now offering threaded barrels for regular and takedown 10/22s.

Barrels & Muzzle Devices-ShopRuger

 

[ruger1800]

10/22 can't be beat for what it is, don't use my for small game since their not accurate enough at extended ranges, Cz 452 perfect for head shots to 60 yards.