S&W 36 or Colt Detective Special?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • modelflyer2003

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 8, 2009
    652
    18
    Eastern Indiana
    I've been looking for a S&W model 36 Chief Special casually. I saw a Colt snub nosed Colt Detective for $500, which I passed on, because it wasn't quite what I was looking for.

    The Colt is a 6 shot, and the Smith is a 5 shot. The Colt is heavier and the grip is a little bigger. I am considering it for concealed carry as a back up gun, so that can make a difference. I know there are better concealed carry options and I usually use my Glock 26 and/or the LCP.

    Anyone have a preference between the S&W Chief Special and the Colt Detective Special?
     

    meyer4589

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    38   0   0
    Feb 25, 2011
    842
    28
    Highland, IN
    Both classic guns. I prefer the 36 and some of the other J-Frames over the Colt just because I would be too afraid to carry the colt since they don't make them any more and they are harder to find in good shape.
     

    Colt556

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    65   0   0
    Feb 12, 2009
    8,941
    113
    Avon
    The Chief would be easier to conceal but the Detective Special has 1 more round and is a little easier to shoot well, for me at least. :twocents:
     

    Erich

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2013
    191
    18
    High Desert of New Mexico
    Man, there's a tough one. If you're comparing the newer Detective Specials to the J-frames, they're virtually the same size. The D-frame has a longer length-of-pull (which is a good thing - they're easier to hit with for men with regular sized hands) and has a barrel that's 2 1/8" long vs. the J-frame's 1 7/8" barrel. The D-frame cylinder is a tiny bit thicker than the J's, but it's really not a big issue, even IWB or in the pocket.

    DetectiveSpecial1Jun80040001resized.jpg


    DetectiveSpecial1Jun80020001resized.jpg


    DetectiveSpecial31may80060001resize.jpg


    DSvCS7jun80010001resizedb.jpg


    DSvCS7jun80020001resizedb.jpg


    DSvCS7jun80040001resizedb.jpg


    DSvCS7jun80030001resizedb.jpg


    As to strength, both have offset bolt cuts in the cylinder - they should both be perfectly adequate for a lifetime of +P use (assuming a steel frame).

    Now, I've never felt comfortable messing inside a D-frame, and the number of good Colt 'smiths is dwindling. A J-frame, however, I can handle - I've changed out parts and done light 'smithing on them without worry.

    What's better? You decide. :)
     

    Six Forty-Two

    Marksman
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 30, 2008
    250
    18
    W. Lafayette
    Is the Colt more comparable in size to the Smith K frame, like a 2 inch model 64? Cylinder width would be about the same.

    Then you are comparing 6 rounds vs 6 rounds. I have a 2 in J frame and was considering a 2 in K frame.
     

    Erich

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2013
    191
    18
    High Desert of New Mexico
    The K-frame is notably larger than the D-frame, but the Colt (1 3/8" diameter) does sort of split the difference while feeling more like a J-frame (1 5/16" diameter - that's 1/16" difference, folks). Sorry to lay more pics on you, but these might be illustrative (tho they were taken to show how a Rhino fits into the scheme of things):

    Colt Detective Special D-frame .38 Spl, Chiappa Rhino .357, S&W 65-5 K-frame .357
    15dec10Rhino002.jpg


    S&W 3" K-frame 65-5, Chiappa Rhino 2", Colt DS 2 1/8", S&W 37-2 1 7/8"
    15dec10Rhino001.jpg
     
    Top Bottom