SAF Asks SCOTUS To Overturn Part Of MD Law

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Lemme get the timeline straight:

    A) Maryland passes draconian anti-gun law requiring "damn good reason" for your desire to exercise your 2nd Am. rights in public in order to obtain a license to do so.

    B) Judge (state?) declares it unconstitutional.

    C) 4th Cir. federal judge vacates that judgement and reinstates the law.

    D) SAF appeals law to SCOTUS.

    That about cover it?
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Lemme get the timeline straight:

    A) Maryland passes draconian anti-gun law requiring "damn good reason" for your desire to exercise your 2nd Am. rights in public in order to obtain a license to do so.

    B) Judge (state?) declares it unconstitutional.

    C) 4th Cir. federal judge vacates that judgement and reinstates the law.

    D) SAF appeals law to SCOTUS.

    That about cover it?
    Sounds about right. Here's hoping SAF does their usual bang up job!
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,053
    113
    Mitchell
    You'd think such a vague requirement as "a good and substantial reason" juxtaposed with "shall not be infringed" as it relates to keeping and bearing arms should be a no-brainer...but anytime you go before the SCOTUS, it's a gamble.
     
    Top Bottom